People prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced ones Why do you think this happens Should the government support local filmmakers financially

Essay topics:

People prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced ones. Why do you think this happens? Should the government support local filmmakers financially?

It has been observed that society is more inclined towards watching international movies rather than their natve films. This essay will first discuss the reasons for foreign films being appreciated more than the locally produced ones and it will further discuss why it is essential for the government to provide monetary assistance to local movie makers.
The two most important reasons that influence people to watch foreign cinema are the high tech effects used by movie makers along with exposure to the cultural background of different countries. The foreign producers and directors enjoy a great deal of support from governemt in terms of substantial amount of funds necessary for implementing in movies with extraordinary technological effects and 3D effects , which not only attracts the attention of audience ut the also experience adrenaline rush. Moreover, by watching foreign movies people get the opportunity to learn about the culture, traditions, values and norms of other countries, thus, are able to widen their cultural know-how. To elucidate, majority of movies such as Avengers and Jurassic Park use latest technolog and equiments along with three-dimensional graffics to create a hype and craze for multinational films.
In order to exceed the viewers of national motion pictures, government should support the local filmakers in terms of providing them with funds together with tax low interest loans, so that they can present the thrilling and exciting effects as well as latest technology and equipemnts on big screen which appeal to the eyes of local people. Furthermore, governemnt should finance the training of local directors and screen writers under the guidance and mentorship of foreign filmakers in order to enhance their skills and knowledge in making wonderful movies with effective storyline and breath taking views and technological effects
In conclusion, people love to watch foreign films to experience remarkable visual and audio effects and broden their cultural knowledge, however, they can be motivate to watch their national movies by not only provding the native movie makers with adequte financial aids but also supporting them monetarily to get coaching and directions from international filmakers.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-02-14 Prabhp 84 view
2020-02-14 Prabhp 56 view
2020-02-14 Prabhp 67 view
2020-02-14 Prabhp 61 view
2020-02-14 Prabhp 84 view
Essays by user Prabhp :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 408, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ary technological effects and 3D effects , which not only attracts the attention o...
^^
Line 3, column 589, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rful movies with effective storyline and breath taking views and technological ef...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, thus, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1905.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52173913043 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83475333247 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576811594203 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 43.0 20.2975951904 212% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 159.095833934 49.4020404114 322% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 238.125 106.682146367 223% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 43.125 20.7667163134 208% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 13.0 7.06120827912 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233790931407 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100289009634 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707795488692 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14864319114 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0684125088191 0.056905535591 120% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 26.1 13.0946893788 199% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 19.37 50.2224549098 39% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 21.2 11.3001002004 188% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.62 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.25 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 19.2 10.1190380762 190% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 408, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ary technological effects and 3D effects , which not only attracts the attention o...
^^
Line 3, column 589, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rful movies with effective storyline and breath taking views and technological ef...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, thus, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1905.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52173913043 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83475333247 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576811594203 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 43.0 20.2975951904 212% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 159.095833934 49.4020404114 322% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 238.125 106.682146367 223% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 43.125 20.7667163134 208% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 13.0 7.06120827912 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233790931407 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100289009634 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707795488692 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14864319114 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0684125088191 0.056905535591 120% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 26.1 13.0946893788 199% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 19.37 50.2224549098 39% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 21.2 11.3001002004 188% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.62 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.25 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 19.2 10.1190380762 190% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.