People spend more money today than they did in the past, and buy more things.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
There is no doubt that individuals are more wealthy as compared to the past nowadays, and they are spending more money on shopping. This trend is certainly a negative development on the part of an individual as they spend their hard-earned money on buying unnecessary stuff; however, this is unarguably beneficial for a country because it stimulates a nation's economy.
Taking into consideration the drawbacks of spending money, when people tend to have extra wealth in their hands, they often prefer to go on a shopping spree in lieu of saving that money for medical emergencies. As a result, they end up buying such items which they hardly utilise. Many working professionals, for instance, love to squander money on state-of-the-art smartwatches to make a good impression on their colleagues. Nevertheless, when they face health care emergencies, such as cancer, they do not have enough savings because such treatments are quite expensive.
Considering the benefits on nations' economy, consumerism is considered as the driving force behind an economy. In other words, consumer spending would increase the demands which would be coped up by inaugurating new manufacturing units and businesses. This would not only increase the tax revenue but also offers more job opportunities. Resultantly, nations' growing markets would be boosted. Recent studies have shown that there is a positive correlation between a country's economy and citizens' shopping habits.
In conclusion, although individuals tend to squander money on non-useful things, its instrumental role in a country's economy cannot be denied. If a country had financial instabilities, citizens would live uncontended and destitute lives.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-16 | Gourav Munjal | 61 | view |
| 2020-08-12 | singla_mba2007 | 89 | view |
- Your friend moved into new home You want to give him her a present Write a letter Describe the present Tell why you want to give this present How will it be delievered to him her 73
- You and your brother made a holiday plan recently for a week but he will not be able to accompany you Write a letter to your friend in which explain the holiday plan explain why your brother will not able to join Invite the friend for this trip 68
- You visited another country to study but are now unable to complete the course Write a letter to your teacher In that letter Thank him her Give reasons as to why you left the course What you enjoyed during the course 87
- Some people think that shops should sell the food items of local market rather then selling foods of other countries Do you agree or disagree 62
- Some believe that technology such as mobile phones cell phones are destroying social interaction Do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 353, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...l for a country because it stimulates a nations economy. Taking into consideration t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 216, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that money for medical emergencies. As a result, they end up buying such items wh...
^^
Line 5, column 29, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...pensive. Considering the benefits on nations economy, consumerism is considered as t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nevertheless, so, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1445.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53639846743 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16298782907 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.624521072797 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3295883221 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.153846154 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0769230769 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252696344928 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0780920253555 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844302578975 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140912091553 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117402466804 0.056905535591 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.