People who read of pleasure have better imagination and language skills than those who prefer watching TV To what extent do you agree

The expressive power and the speaking skills are well developed among the individual who opt to read more stuff regularly irrespective of the others who watch broadcasted serials on smart televisions. This essay completely agrees that reading frequently increase our knowledge and vocabulary despite of watching the irrelevant stuff aired on TV.
Most of the population develops the habit of reading books, journals, novels etc. in their leisure time which helps in developing the mind imaginative power and master them in that specific language. This hobby boosts their knowledge of the subjected item as they are reciting it on regular basis. For example, the Education board of India states that 92% of the children prefers to read books in their free time which motivate them to express freely in extempore competitions in schools.

The development of vocal skills among the youngsters is improved drastically as they choose to read more books. The vocabulary or the lexical skills are improved considerably when different variety of the material is read by any individual. The reader learns the correct spelling of a word by seeing it printed in a book, and they grasp its meaning from the context, without having to look it up in a dictionary. For instance, the language school across the UK, ask students to read minimum of 2 books in a week before choosing a specific language for expertise.
To conclude, wasting time in watching series which are broadcasted online doesn’t help an individual even though reading expands person’s thinking power as well as make them expert in a specific linguistic.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 242, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...the material is read by any individual. The reader learns the correct spelling of a...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, well, for example, for instance, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1357.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17938931298 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79433369488 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595419847328 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1164441978 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.363636364 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8181818182 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18181818182 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185085226933 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634010844407 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478440177718 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104945183015 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0671585609525 0.056905535591 118% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.