The prevention of health problems is more important than treatment. Government funding should reflect that.
Do you agree or disagree?
Many people argue that government and local authorities should rather take measures to prevent diseases, than to use budgets for curing those. I agree with the former for two reasons. Firstly, it is always easier to detect, than to prevent an issue and secondly, I think a special consideration should be taken when discussing humans' health. This essay will further discuss both arguments.
Various studies have shown that to overcome any problem, it is much more efficient and effective to take the approach of identification and prevention, instead of later detection. With regards to healthcare, this would mean that it will be less costy and more time-saving for government to organize periodic vaccinations and diagnostical procedures, than to provide with free or partially free treatment to a population in an overall poor health condition. For instance, we can compare strategies of the United States and any Scandinavian country and we will see that less money is spent in the latter, however people living there are healthier. Of course, there are more than one reason why people get sick more often in one country, than in the other, but I consider the above-mentioned fact to be the main one.
Besides that, we must not forget that it is people's health and lives that can be endangered, would a wrong healthcare tactic be adopted. Governments are not only responsible for proper fund management, but also it is their responsibility to do their best to have a health and happy population. In my opinion, even if the effect of prevention and defeating a disease is the same in terms of money, no person would choose to get sick and then to recover.
To sum up, I believe it is more beneficial to keep a nation healthy, than to later try to come up with solutions. I am also assured that those charged with governance have enough power and means to help population avoid illnesses and diseases.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-06 | marosa | 84 | view |
| 2018-10-06 | sahilverma16 | 67 | view |
- With increase population and even growing urban centers, many countries are losing their natural beauty spots.What benefits are there to protect places of natural beauty?How can this be solved? 89
- Governments should spend more money on railways rather than roads.Do you agree or disagree? 78
- Life in the 21st century is better compared to the previous century. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people fail in school, but end up being successful in life. Why do you think that is the case? What is most important thing to succeed in life? 84
- With increase population and even growing urban centers many countries are losing their natural beauty spots What benefits are there to protect places of natural beauty How can this be solved 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: COMMA_THAN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'then'?
Suggestion: then
...ther take measures to prevent diseases, than to use budgets for curing those. I agre...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, for instance, i think, of course, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9226006192 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84412468642 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594427244582 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5675574316 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.307692308 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8461538462 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3846153846 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239029137817 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0703274348016 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455897302639 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127861653283 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378915420679 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.