The responsibility to prevent and reduce global environmental damage is for politicians rather than individuals. How far do you agree or disagree?
Many argue that the burden of stopping and decreasing the damage of worldwide environment rely on politicians more than ordinary persons. I totally disagree with this statement and shall point out the factors that show that preventing global environmental damage is a common responsibility for the whole society.
Firstly, the effect of the whole world environmental damage will be on all mankind and not just politicians. To elaborate on this, a natural disaster that may occur as a result of human beings action to the environment will not destroy homes, properties or even take lives of the politicians’ segment only , but it will overrun the whole population residing in the location where this natural disaster occur. For example, the tsunami in Malaysia few years ago, a total of 4000 persons were reported dead because of the tsunami that occurred as a result of global warming caused originally by mankind. Furthermore, despite the fact that politicians must be held responsible for their actions towards this critical global issue and have to answer to the whole society, all other segments hold the same share of responsibility. As individuals we have a responsibility towards our children and the next generations.
Secondly, practical actions to face the global environmental damage require cooperation among all society segments and not just politicians. To illustrate, although politicians can introduce laws to limit mankind damage to the environment, without the cooperation of the people themselves to follow these rules and the awareness of the consequences if not followed, nothing will be accomplished. For instance, if politicians, through government, imposed a ‘green taxes’ on drivers but people neglected the law and paid the taxes instead of trying to switch to other sources of power, the problem will increase.
To conclude, global environmental damage is a serious issue that should concern all mankind and not just politicians and all individuals in the society must work out together to face this problem.
- In many places traditional food has been replaced by international fast food. This had adverse effects on the individuals and society.Do you agree or disagree. 73
- Old workers often retire at the age of 60 or 65 Some people say that workers should be allowed to work as long as they want to What is your opinion 51
- Computers are very quick in translating various languages; some people say it is useless to learn any new foreign languages. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Old workers often retire at the age of 60 or 65. Some people say that workers should be allowed to work as long as they want to. What is your opinion?. 73
- Old workers often retire at the age of 60 or 65. Some people say that workers should be allowed to work as long as they want to. What is your opinion?. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 187, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
...ter that may occur as a result of human beings action to the environment will not dest...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 311, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...es of the politicians' segment only , but it will overrun the whole populatio...
^^
Line 3, column 455, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...oliticians, through government, imposed a 'green taxes' on drivers but ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1737.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41121495327 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12384695753 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557632398754 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.955729329 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.909090909 106.682146367 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1818181818 20.7667163134 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.36363636364 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212258118495 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0881095340389 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590457041937 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148015905924 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067539205815 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.69 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.