Safety standards are important when building people's homes. Who should be responsible for enforcing strict building codes - the government or the people who build the houses.Use your own knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examp

Essay topics:

Safety standards are important when building people's homes. Who should be responsible for enforcing strict building codes - the government or the people who build the houses.

Use your own knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.

Surviving in a safe environment is what all thrive for. So, it becomes imperative that the homes we build and live in are safe. Houses and colonies should be constructed with all the requisite safety features in occurrence of accidents. In order to achieve this, a shared responsibility of government and the people is vital.

The authorities should implement a model that any new construction plan has to be approved by all the involved departments such as Environmental Board, Urban Development Board, etc. A protocol for each type of construction should be designed, be it a commercial complex or a residential block or a hospital. Making it obligatory to build structures in accord with all the safety standards and approvals will render a safer environment. Therefore, the onus is on the government to enforce stiffer codes for buildings. Luton, a suburb to London, sets an example of planned architecture laying much importance to safety norms. Every building has adequate emergency and fire exits and has ample area of setback.

Though imposing standards is an initiative which government has to focus on, it is an equal responsibility that people also have to share. People should be falling in line voluntarily to construct buildings abiding by the law. An inevitable fact that has to be understood is that standards are for their own well-being. Furthermore, imposing high penalties or demolition of illegal constructions will also deter people from blatantly flouting and violating the construction regulations.

In conclusion, governments and people should collaborate to build safer homes for themselves.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-04-03 Komal Ahuja 61 view
2019-04-03 Komal Ahuja 61 view
2018-12-04 likiyash 61 view
Essays by user likiyash :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, therefore, well, as to, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1373.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36328125 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21533258738 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58984375 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.7928329022 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5333333333 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0666666667 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.86666666667 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305915545334 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103261957129 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592110583561 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200665060972 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0265353977627 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.