Shops should give preference in selling local food rather than imported food. Do you agree or disagree?
It is a matter of debate whether local food products should be sold or imported ones by the vendors. It would appear that selling of imported meals is more beneficial for both the sellers and consumers.
At the outset, the wiser man business person is a person who takes care of the needs of his consumers. Owing to global influence, more and more people of these days are more interested in imported food. An international brand like KFC and Mac D are the example of this trend. Also, it is because of the quality and uniqueness that could be found in certain imported food products. So, by selling imported products shopkeeper can gain huge benefits, which would not possible by selling only local brands. Thus, local people can enjoy the imported food just at their nearby market, eventually both consumer and businessmen get benefits of this selling strategy.
On the other hand, distributing only local foods could lead to more competition amongst vendors. Because of its availability, local meals could be found everywhere, so it does not add any significance of the particular shop. For instance, Indian traditional food 'chapatis' is even available at home; so, why would people buy this product from the seller? That is the reason that a sense of competition could be increased to sell these products. Furthermore, local food might be spoiled due to its excess storage at stock, if it does not sell timely. Hence, the government had better export of local products to import foreign food products.
To conclude, this essay discussed the reason why imported food should be sold instead of local food. I think the selling of imported food is more beneficial for the profit of sellers as well for the sake of consumer's interest.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-04 | saipriyanka | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | D_g_b | 73 | view |
| 2018-12-06 | jenny0918 | 81 | view |
| 2018-11-18 | Eranga Wasana | 47 | view |
- SOME PEOPLE CLAIM THAT NOT ENOUGH OF THE WASTE FROM HOMES IS RECYCLED. THEY SAY THAT THE ONLY WAY TO INCREASE RECYCLING IS FOR GOVERNMENTS TO MAKE IT A LEGAL REQUIREMENT. TO WHAT EXTEND DO YOU THINK LAWS ARE NEEDED TO MAKE PEOPLE RECYCLE MORE OF THEIR WAS 56
- Punishment is a good way to address the behavioural problem in children. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- There will be a traditional celebration in your country and you want to invite your friendfrom an English-speaking country. Write him/her a letter and- invite your friend,- explain what happens at the party,- describe the tradition and why it’s importan 73
- You are working in an international company. You want to quit your job. Write a letter to your manager why you want to quit when you want to leave what you like about the company 78
- Recently you had a holiday overseas and you stay with a family member who has sent you a letter and some photos of your holiday. Write a letter to your family member -thanks for the photos and for the holiday -explain why you did not send a letter -invite 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 406, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'products'' or 'product's'?
Suggestion: products'; product's
... food products. So, by selling imported products shopkeeper can gain huge benefits, whic...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, so, thus, well, for instance, i think, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96463022508 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60392197115 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530546623794 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.7143092927 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.7777777778 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2777777778 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05555555556 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.470805213844 0.244688304435 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166133945503 0.084324248473 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.175065584043 0.0667982634062 262% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.380958902404 0.151304729494 252% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.310836554908 0.056905535591 546% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.