Should the government provide people with free accommodation?
The issue of accommodation is so acute that a growing number of people are struggling to rent or save money. This leads one to wonder whether governments should supply them with housing. This essay opposes this point of view and gives an explanation.
The first reason is that this initiative may trigger an outburst in population growth. It is scientifically proven that the number of population is directly dependent on the availability of housing. Thus, by securing young families with free housing, the country would face an uncontrolled increase in the population size, which would lead to a shortage of resources and inevitable collapse in the economy.
Another reason why governments should not provide people with free places to live in is that people would be less motivated to work. Many people get employed to save up for buying a house in the future, but the housing supple by the government would gradually exempt them from going to work. This exemption would eventually have an adverse impact on the economic development, resulting in economic crisis and people having to go to work again.
However, some sociologists think that securing people with free housing is necessary. They say that it would help many families, which do not have houses, to settle down in one place. Despite this, providing housing is an unreasonable campaign since the construction would hardly keep pace with a growing population. Even if the government could do it, they would constantly face an acute shortage of building materials during construction, leading to long-term delays.
In conclusion, the idea of providing people free housing is irrational because it would lead to serious economical and social problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-20 | asmita acharya | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-20 | asmita acharya | 67 | view |
| 2022-07-29 | vu_hieu2k5 | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-12 | Surbhithegirl | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-29 | roopdeep | 61 | view |
- Some people think that intelligence is innate while others think that we can improve our intelligence through learning.Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 67
- The younger generation is mainly responsible for latest technological developments How far do you agree 67
- Every country has poor people and every country has different ways of dealing with the poor.What are some of the reasons for world poverty? How can the poor be helped? 73
- Due to the development and rapid expansion of supermarkets in some countries, many small, local businesses are unable to compete. Some people think that the closure of local business will bring about the death of local communities. To what extent do you a 84
- Some sports are extremely dangerous but many people still like them very much. Why do people take part in dangerous sports? Give some suggestions on how to deal with these dangers. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...int of view and gives an explanation. The first reason is that this initiative...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d inevitable collapse in the economy. Another reason why governments should no...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and people having to go to work again. However, some sociologists think that se...
^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...truction, leading to long-term delays. In conclusion, the idea of providing peo...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, thus, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1449.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23104693141 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84012063787 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570397111913 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5404543697 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.5 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7857142857 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78571428571 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324685307903 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112511138395 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122551166542 0.0667982634062 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178725507062 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0726023394014 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.