Every human on this planet requires basic resources such as food, shelter and water for their survival. Some people opine that wealthy nations should lend their support by sharing resources such as food and education, while others argue it is a government task to look after their citizens. In my view, the developed countries should support the poor if there is a scarcity of natural resources in their country.
To begin with, without any doubt, the elected government of a country should be responsible to take care of their well-being citizens. The national authorities should plan ahead for their infrastructure developments and opportunities for their citizens so that they can live independently. In order to achieve this, the ruling people must have a long-term plan, skillful resources, mitigation strategies, economic reserves and supplies. Although these are fundamental requirements for a country, there are the important factors which change the social status or life style of their people. Besides, the authorities should also ensure the quality education, and healthcare are provided to their countrymen to improve the literacy rate in their society. Lack of planning will result in poor education, low standards and detrimental impact.
On the other hand, not all countries can operate without the support of rich nations either because they are in lack of natural resources or widespread corruption or unforeseen natural calamities. For such instances, the first-class nation supposed to extend their support to underdeveloped countries. Being said that, there are lot of wealthy countries are wasting a staggering amount of food while millions of citizens from poor country such as Asia and Africa continents are starving for food and most of the time they go to bed in empty stomach. This is inhuman and should not happen when we equally created but not equally prevailed. Therefore, a small support in education and development from advanced nations to weaker countries will create a bigger impact in their society and people attitude. Perhaps, these kinds of humanitarian actions or social reliefs create a strong bonding between the continents to reduce border tension and crime rates in their home country. For example, United Nations has funded African countries like Somalia, Nigeria etc., continuously to fight against their poverty. Without their help, the government is unable to supply the basic needs for their people.
To conclude, rich countries should help the poor nations only if the later do not have abundant natural resources to support their people. If they have surplus resources then it’s should be their concern government accountability to handle their issues as part of their internal affairs.
- Your family is going to move to another town Write a letter to the Principal of a local school asking if they will accept your son Describe his academic achievements and scope of interests 78
- You and your family are living in rented accommodation in an English speaking country You are not satisfied with the condition of some of the furniture Write a letter to the landlord In your letter introduce yourself explain what is wrong with the fur
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves 73
- Are famous people treated unfairly by the media Should they be given more privacy or is the price of their fame an invasion into their private life Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant ex 78
- More children in developed countries are becoming overweight. This is a serious problemfor wealthy countries.Discuss some causes and effects of this problem. Give reasons for your answer, andinclude any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experie 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, look, so, then, therefore, well, while, for example, such as, in my view, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2319.0 1615.20841683 144% => OK
No of words: 430.0 315.596192385 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39302325581 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76761871626 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544186046512 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 701.1 506.74238477 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1830989403 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.052631579 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6315789474 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21052631579 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360516247943 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119524407916 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0816139050459 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252123479617 0.151304729494 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349667170383 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.