Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Earlier we ban smoking in public areas, better it would be for coming generation. 'A stitch in time saves nine' is exemplary saying in case of smoking.Having foreseen that, many government bodies and offices imposed a strict ban on public smoking. This measure is generally applauded by majority of mass. However, the multitude of youngsters contend on this imparting as an act of arrest of ones' will. I totally accede with former notion, and want to enunciate my perception on this moot below.
To commence with, It is generally perceived and even proven with scientific studies that smoking is injurious to our health. The health problems that smoke can induce are numerous. Smoking in public areas can cause multifarious unpragmatic repercussions on the passive smoker. Since smoke directly attack on human respiratory organ which afterwards effect on human's systematic and peripheral circulation. In fact, the havoc of this insane habit in public can even culminate cancer problem to someone as one of its detrimental ramifications. Besides this, many deteriorated effects can be seen on unborn children. Smoking can make anyone life miserable as it is also mentioned rightly on its packet that it can even cause death.
Secondly, The emission of carbon and toxic elements in the atmosphere by the active smokers has reached such dizzy heights that its results can be seen on passive smokers in foreseeable future. After UV rays, Smoking advanced from any source would damage the atmosphere because of its hazardous and unrelenting nature. Consequences of smoking can be seen on many children resulting in poor eyesight who are usually going in public area where active smokers wrongly using their freedom. By restricting smokers in open areas, we can make our contemporary society to a living place by maintaining its natural tendency.
In a nutshell, Imposing ban on smoke in public is not just justifying but a necessity as it calls for. Though it is constraint on ones' freedom but it is beneficial for whole society. It would be a profound decisive step as well if government take some punitive measures on public smoking to keep our ecology clean.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-19 | rafsunielts2019 | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | rafsunielts2019 | 73 | view |
| 2018-10-11 | vinod7 | 84 | view |
- In many places the role of father and mother is changing Do you think it s a positive or negative development 50
- Your neighbour burns his garbage near your house Write a letter to him and include the following 1 complain about the situation 2 Explain about the affects of his actions on your family 3 Suggest a solution 67
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interest, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree.Discuss both these vie 78
- In recent years, the family structure has changed, as well as family roles. What are the changes which have occured? Do you think these changes are positive or negative? 84
- In many places the role of father and mother is changing Do you think it s a positive or negative development 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 150, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Having
... is exemplary saying in case of smoking.Having foreseen that, many government bodies a...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 390, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...n this imparting as an act of arrest of ones will. I totally accede with former noti...
^^^^
Line 7, column 130, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...it calls for. Though it is constraint on ones freedom but it is beneficial for wh...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1811.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13031161473 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82177149493 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600566572238 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1779994669 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3157894737 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5789473684 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57894736842 7.06120827912 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217452994674 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693915525029 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574684349403 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134024347922 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0217070301236 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.