Some believe that modern technology is increasing the gap between rich and poor people, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Modern Technology has definitely impacted every aspect of human lives. For many reasons, some people tend to support the view that new technological developments have led to a divide between the upper class and the lower class while others disagree. In my opinion technological developments has not only bridged the ever-increasing gap of rich and poor but on the other hand made life much easier for the lower class workers. In this essay, I will elucidate both sides of the argument and conclude with my opinion.
Firstly with the advent of the automation, most of the industries are replacing manual jobs with computerized automated machines which has certainly increased the unemployment ratio in the past decade. The effect is more evident in manufacturing industries where according to a survey conducted by global times most of the manual labour jobs are replaced by machines, therefore, affecting the poor class.
Secondly, on the other side of the argument technology inventions like computers, software and automation aid the workers while performing meticulous tasks thereby improving productivity, efficiency. For instance, as per the recent survey conducted in India with the introduction of machines and the latest software in the agriculture industry productivity has increased ten folds thus increasing the profitability and wages of the labour class of the sector. Similar examples can be found in the information technology industry where juvenile minds from the poor families made it to the millionaire club. For instance, founders of internet giants like Amazon, Alibaba, and Facebook all come lower class families. Hence technology has provided innumerable opportunities thus bridging the monetary gap.
To sum up, technology plays a pivotal role in narrowing down the differences in social classes. Improvements in productivity, increased numbers of opportunities in jobs are the best examples in bridging the wealth gap.
- Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- You took your family to a nearby restaurant. You were disappointed with the meal and wish to complain to the manager. Write a letter to the manager of the restaurant. In the letter:1. Explain why you were at the restaurant2. Describe the problems3. write 89
- On a recent holiday, you lost a valuable item. Fortunately, you have travel insurance to cover the cost of anything lost.Write a letter to the manager of your insurance company. In your letterdescribe the item you lostexplain how you lost ittell the insur 78
- You have borrowed something from your friend, but it was damaged. Write a letter to your friend and say- Apologize for damaging the product- How was it damaged?- What will you do about it? 73
- You have just come back from a holiday overseas. When you arrived back, you discovered that the airline had lost your suitcase. Write to the Customer Relations department of the airline. In your letter•explain the situation•describe the suitcase and i 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 516, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... argument and conclude with my opinion. Firstly with the advent of the automatio...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 716, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...acebook all come lower class families. Hence technology has provided innumerable opp...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 804, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...unities thus bridging the monetary gap. To sum up, technology plays a pivotal ro...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1656.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53846153846 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0845006301 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598662207358 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.059562576 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.384615385 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3846153846 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234477159828 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.075998007681 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588455985965 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129439970198 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100438822728 0.056905535591 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.