In some cities there are few controls on the design and construction of homes and other buildings and owners can decide on the style of their houses Do the advantages of this outweigh the drawbacks

People live in cities like to have the unique architectural design of the building, and some government do not have relevant standards to regulate construction. However, whether the public should continue with this situation sparks much debate. Some people suggest establishing policies of building control while others do not. This essay will discuss the pros and cons of this phenomenon and why proper measures should be taken to control the building’s design and construction.

Without control from the authorities, property owners can design and construct the buildings into their favourite styles. Since individuals vary in the preference of housing, this seems to be an excellent way to fix their needs respectively and improve their living standard. However, the essential required functions of living space are universal, and it could be standardised.

On the other hand, people might ignore the safety and quality in order to pursuit speciality of building appearance and result in adverse impacts on society such as human injuries incurred by the collapsed structure. Also, the flexibility of building construction might jeopardise our environment and other industries’ operation, for example, the improperly planned skyscraper, without consideration of location, could be a significant hazard to the airline industry as blocking the airline route. In addition, the building in modern cities plays a significant role in city landscape and urban planning, and it should be appropriately designed at a macro level. Otherwise, a freely built housing or office may not be able to match the neighbourhood. In this case, the government should provide public and building contractors a master plan for improving urban aesthetics.

This essay discussed both the advantages and disadvantages of construction flexibility. In summary, people should design their living space under the proper regulations that not restrict humankind’s creation but ensure the construction quality and comprehensive consider other social factors.

Votes
Average: 8.1 (10 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 267, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'buildings'' or 'building's'?
Suggestion: buildings'; building's
...vernment should intervene to ensure the buildings security and the best use of materials ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 336, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...st use of materials and land resources. In addition, as buildings constitute the l...
^^
Line 7, column 96, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
... their houses, while in some cases, the governments regulation and coordination are require...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 150, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gulation and coordination are required.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, so, while, in addition, in fact, in some cases

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1409.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46124031008 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95221899923 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.627906976744 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9673227253 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.416666667 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22628106543 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0820445162452 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570349493171 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128105903483 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396261773812 0.056905535591 70% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.