Some countries today have passed laws against smoking tobacco in public buildings such as offices and restaurants. Other countries have no intention of doing this. Consider the possible arguments on both sides of this debate, and reach your own conclusion on which side you favor.
It is an undeniable fact that the smoking tobacco deteriorates the public health and yet only a few countries around the world have imposed restriction against it. However, the issue is not entirely straightforward, and there are countries for which it is not feasible or even possible to ban the tobacco. This essay discusses the debate and gives a concluding view.
On one hand, those who support the regulations against tobacco consumptions cite the fact that the smoke of tobacco is not only harmful to the smokers, but also to the surrounding people, especially to infants and pregnant ladies. They cite the scientifically proven fact that secondhand smoke is far more dangerous than gas emitted by car engines during fuel combustion. Moreover, this camp gives an example of countries like Singapore, where smoking in public places is legally outlawed. They claim that having such rules has improved the public health in the country which is evident from its life expectancy data. To the supporter of such law, these arguments are convincing.
By contrast, officials from countries such as India and Afghanistan, which show no interest in prohibiting smoking in public places, point out that tobacco consumption and export significantly contributes to overall GDP. This is because many farmers and retail sellers are involved in this line of business and they will suffer financially if the governments would pass law against tobacco. Another reason is the presence and the influence of drugs mafia in the parliament which resists passing any laws that can hurt their empire.
Overall, it seems more sensible for any country to outlaw the tobacco consumption to improve the health and life expectancy of its citizens. Countries which face difficulty in implementing such rules would need to build alternative income sources for their citizens and get rid the influence of drug mafia in lawmaking.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-24 | msafaie | 73 | view |
| 2021-05-21 | Dyor | 67 | view |
| 2020-08-30 | ashfaqmemon | 89 | view |
| 2020-08-30 | ashfaqmemon | 78 | view |
| 2019-01-13 | void | 75 | view |
- Some countries today have passed laws against smoking tobacco in public buildings such as offices and restaurants Other countries have no intention of doing this Consider the possible arguments on both sides of this debate and reach your own conclusion on 89
- You are going to another country to study You would like to do a part time job while you are studying so you want to ask a friend who lives there for some help Write a letter to this friend In your letter give details of your study plans explain why you w 81
- You would like to participate in a work related seminar in another country Write a letter to the person in charge of the seminar and ask for detailed information regarding the Dates Program accommodation and cost 78
- Some countries today have passed laws against smoking tobacco in public buildings such as offices and restaurants Other countries have no intention of doing this Consider the possible arguments on both sides of this debate and reach your own conclusion on 78
- You have seen a job advertised in the newspaper You want to apply for the job Write a letter to the manager of the company In your letter provide information about yourself give details of your previous work experience say why the company should consider 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, second, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23202614379 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81454521092 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591503267974 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2931139198 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.153846154 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5384615385 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07692307692 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307729006734 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105055193632 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045965464822 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186360907267 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534449462902 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, second, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23202614379 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81454521092 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591503267974 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2931139198 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.153846154 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5384615385 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07692307692 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307729006734 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105055193632 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045965464822 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186360907267 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534449462902 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.