In some developing countries, it is difficult to get good teachers to work in rural areas which can have a negative impact on the education of children in those rural communities.
Why do you think good teachers do not want to work in rural areas in developing countries?
What could be done to solve this problem?
Few developing countries face difficulties to hire good teachers to work in rural educational institutions. This essay will discuss what are the causes of teachers adamant to work in rural areas and propose possible solutions to curb this problem.
To embark on, the cardinal factors for educational instructors hesitating to work in villages, an important one to consider is the low pay scale. This is because government offers basic salary in these places as revenue generation is very minimal, which results a dip in standard of living. In contrast, in prominent cities, private schools offer high compensation and better lifestyle attracts majority of the personnel. To combat this problem, government should provide equal pay to teachers irrespective of work location and who belong to the same cadre. As a result, it motivates them to grab the opportunities as working in rural areas provides more savings due to lower cost of living.
Another pressing problem for teaching faculty in working in rural educational set-up is the poor infrastructure facilities. Thus, it kills the interest in students to learn and in tutors to teach. For instance, it is reported in media that there is a significant fall in number of admissions in country side schools and colleges due to environment not being conducive for educational purpose. Dealing with issue involves government to invest a substantial amount in infrastructure development such as hi-tech classrooms, a good library, laboratories, and other facilities. Accordingly, more number of students will join and this will increase the teaching staff subsequently.
In conclusion, two of the vital causes for teachers hesitating to work in rural areas are low monthly income and bad facilities on offer. However, these problems should be minimized if government increases the salaries and invest in good infrastructure to encourage teaching and learning.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-29 | lakhveer khokhar | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-29 | lakhveer khokhar | 56 | view |
| 2022-01-29 | lakhveer khokhar | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | sumanth74 | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-15 | Yuu0201 | 56 | view |
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish.Why do you think this is happening?What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced? 78
- Hobbies need to be difficult to make them interesting.To what extent do you agree or disagree. 56
- More and more newspapers and news channels are using photographs to support their news articles and stories. Some people think that photographs are not reliable source of news while others consider photographs to be irrefutable.Discuss both views and give 84
- In some cities and towns all over the world, the high volume of traffic is a problem.What are the causes of this?What actions can be taken to solve this problem? 78
- Overpopulation in many major urban centers around the world is a major problem. What are the causes of this? How can this problem be solved? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, however, if, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1619.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43288590604 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09744631687 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577181208054 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.2488443867 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 115.642857143 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255958083925 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0896205181996 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0929387924853 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180850492256 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0915118857583 0.056905535591 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.