Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary schools rather than secondary school.
Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
Presently, the importance of learning a foreign language to survive in a globalized world has risen into prominence in many parts of the world. That is why, there has been a growing body of opinion favoring primary school students to learn an exotic language instead of at secondary institutions, while I am in consummate discord with it. Despite the many advantages that derive from this arrangment, I firmly opine that it is predominantly disadvantageous to the primary school students as it would act as a deterrent to their holistic development.
For one, although learning a foreign language at primary school is a way to compete at the global level by having a deep understanding of other linguistic structures at a young age, most students are likely to struggle to develop up to the potential. It is evident that at a young age, children need enough time and energy to learn not only their own mother tongue but also to adapt to society's morals, customs, and values. Further, a primitive instance of this is exemplified by young pupils who already find it difficult to know everything about arithmetic and extremely confusing concepts of history and science. If they are made to learn a brand new language, they might not develop their cognitive abilities appropriately. Therefore, this is an implausible recommendation.
In addition, primary school teenagers feel the intense pressure of adapting to a new language. This forceful learning can be a negative experience for them, deterring them to learn a foreign language even in the future. A statistic was recently released demonstrating that the forceful learning environment at teenagers has caused many students to hate learning new things in adulthood, causing them to be unsuccessful at times. Moreover, when students at secondary school learn these languages of foreign countries, they develop camaraderie with a learning atmosphere and tend to show eagerness to learn more about it. Hence, this discussion clearly shows that it is an optimal way to let secondary students focus on learning a foreign language rather than primary school students.
Following the look, in spite of the pros of giving more capabilities to be competitive in a stiff globalized environment, addition of foreign language learning in the primary curriculum has many more drawbacks than favorable points. I thus hope that human intelligence and ingenuity continue to work work to lessen the burdens of young children of primary schools in the foreseeable future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-08 | mahya25 | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-29 | lakhveer khokhar | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-29 | manu_kaur113 | 61 | view |
| 2020-08-04 | balwinderbuttar01 | 84 | view |
| 2020-08-03 | balwinderbuttar01 | 78 | view |
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary schools rather than secondary school Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Subjects like arts music and drama are more important than other school subjects and therefore should be give more time in the calendar Do you agree or disagree 73
- With the rise of e books comes the decline of the paper books what are advantages and disadvantages of this trend 78
- In your letter you should describe why you want to work in that country tell him her about your skills and experience ask some questions related to work e g wage salary 73
- Negative efects of misbehaviour of celebrities 11
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 295, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: work
... intelligence and ingenuity continue to work work to lessen the burdens of young children...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, while, in addition, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2109.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 403.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23325062035 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04249934607 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531017369727 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 671.4 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.5486441309 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.6 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8666666667 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381567704321 0.244688304435 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127138713008 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756644903758 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230061087434 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0622893597601 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 295, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: work
... intelligence and ingenuity continue to work work to lessen the burdens of young children...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, while, in addition, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2109.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 403.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23325062035 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04249934607 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531017369727 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 671.4 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.5486441309 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.6 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8666666667 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381567704321 0.244688304435 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127138713008 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756644903758 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230061087434 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0622893597601 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.