Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary schools rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
In this era, the ability to speak outside our mother language has become more crucial than ever. It could help us to connect and interact with people around the world. Thus, the earlier for us to learn this capability, the better the results. A question then rise whether or not it is necessary to teach this to the pupils in the elementary school. In this essay, I will cover both pros and cons of this question.
Teaching a foreign language early will bring several advantages for the students. Firstly, kids in the primary period often learn something more effectively. For example, in research done by some experts, children under the age of ten will grasp and implement more skills with the same methods of learning if compared with more mature ones. Secondly, the children have perfect brain which easier to do something include learn the new language. By giving these kids ahead of time, they will get more chances to practice. So, resulting in more fluent capability in the real life.
However, the downside of letting this type of ability being practised early in their life is mainly around the confusion caused by it. For instance, the children who were allowed to practice foreign speaking will get confused when having conversations in their home or in their daily activities due to the complex thinking caused by the multi-linguistic brain. They tend to have difficulties expressing some words which a harder time giving full meaning sentences when speaking with other people without mixing the languages.
To sump up from where I stand, giving chances for primary school pupils to learn foreign-speaking will give more advantages than the negative effects. The key to successful results is to let teachers and parents having collaborated with each other to give more impact and supervision to the children.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-08 | mahya25 | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-29 | lakhveer khokhar | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-29 | manu_kaur113 | 61 | view |
| 2020-08-04 | balwinderbuttar01 | 84 | view |
| 2020-08-03 | balwinderbuttar01 | 78 | view |
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Is this a positive or negative development 67
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities Other however say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required 56
- At the present time the population of some contries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages 73
- the tables below give information about sales of fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five european contries Summarise the informationby selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 265, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...etter the results. A question then rise whether or not it is necessary to teach this to the pu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, thus, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02310231023 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61942269335 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590759075908 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6336524292 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.125 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9375 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229332814719 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742357057235 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604178454193 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138420316359 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461837784453 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.