Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?

Essay topics:

Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?

When is the appropriate time for adolescent to learn a foreign language such as English or Chinese is a controversial issue for long time. Some people believe that the primary level is the ideal time for learning foreign language, while other opposes this view and think that the children should learn foreign language when they are at secondary level of education. There is no doubt that both views have some advantages and disadvantages as well.
To begin with, the main virtue of learning a foreign language at primary level is that at this age the students have better perception of language as well as they also have better remembering. Because kids always learn faster than any other and they also able to memorize that things for long time. Furthermore, the students of primary level have flexible tongue, which assist them to accustom of pronunciation faster. For example, my cousin who started learning English at the age of four even before he went to school. Now unknown people often mistakenly assume that he is a native English speaker. Finally, children of primary school have more times to familiar with the language. This means that they have more time to learn the language very well.
On the other hand, sometimes it is better not to hurry up with loading children with foreign language. Besides, knowing a foreign language the juveniles has numerous things to learn at primary level. Thus they are already over burdened and the extra pressure of another foreign language would cause detrimental effect on children psychology. Instead, the parents of young children should engage their child to learn the norms and customs of the society in which they live. It seems that children can concentrate on educating themselves in foreign language at secondary level.
To summarize, it could be emphasized that despite these two opinions on when the adolescent should learn foreign language, it should be the sole discretion of the respective parents when their children should learn a second language based on their potentiality of their children. Both of these views have merits and demerits, which should bear in mind by the parents.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-05-13 gkb 73 view
2019-05-13 gkb 73 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 200, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...erous things to learn at primary level. Thus they are already over burdened and the ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 233, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... children should learn a second language based on their potentiality of their chi...
^^
Line 4, column 369, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ich should bear in mind by the parents.
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, finally, furthermore, second, so, thus, well, while, for example, no doubt, such as, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1798.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06478873239 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54556570939 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487323943662 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6612965246 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.764705882 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8823529412 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.47058823529 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378615705603 0.244688304435 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124032887552 0.084324248473 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0857760450072 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234042748637 0.151304729494 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0932489449117 0.056905535591 164% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.