When people succeed, it is because of hard work. Luck has nothing to do with success.” Do you agree or disagree with the quotation above? Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position.
Perseverance and working hard is the key to success. Without working hard, no one can be able to succeed only with the help of luck. I personally believe that working hard is the principal factor, which assists a person to reach at the apex of his/her career. I assert this view for two main reasons, which I will elaborate in the following essay.
First of all, hard-working help a person to gain depth knowledge in any subject matter and it is true for any occupation. Without having profound knowledge about his/her profession, no one can reach to the zenith of his/her career. To work hard is the prerequisite of being successful in any field. My own life is the compelling example of this. Currently, I am working at a software firm as an analyst. I have not come to this state in a day. To become successful, I had to work hard to grow my expertise in different languages, which are required for developing software. Striving for more than four years, now I am at apex of my career and widely recognized for my works.
Secondly, working hard helps a person to become exemplary to his/her peers. If a person does not have depth knowledge in respective field and only by luck s/he reaches at the peak of career, then s/he will not be able to sustain his/her position for long time. At some point of time, s/he will fail down from that position. For instance, at my office, I had a boss, who did not have profound knowledge about software engineering as well as capacity to manage his subordinate. When the management of our office changed, that person lost his job. Therefore, without gaining profound knowledge by working hard, it is very difficult to survive in this modern world.
In conclusion, I assert that hard working is the prime factor to become successful in any profession. Without hardworking it is not possible to acquire profound knowledge as well as to sustain in a position for longer period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-15 | bikram | 80 | view |
| 2019-10-09 | suhas201227 | 73 | view |
| 2019-04-17 | nicktyranov | 83 | view |
| 2019-04-05 | gkb | 60 | view |
| 2019-01-10 | zekboy | 66 | view |
- Four day working per week versus five day working per week 75
- Television appearance is of great benefit for university. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Modern technology is creating a single world culture. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 73
- It has recently been announced that a large shopping center may be built in your neighborhood. Do you support or oppose this plan? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 73
- Altruistic behaviour of people and animals. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 227, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ustain in a position for longer period.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, as to, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1589.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 338.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70118343195 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69587675521 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502958579882 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.105895758 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.45 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116928230692 0.236089414692 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483395783058 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513241273745 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0871774878243 0.150856017488 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398419601893 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.68 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.