Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed (damaged) by human activity. Others feel that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live. What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Among the planets, only earth is suitable for human being. Earth has provided us all the necessary things, which are required to live. Since the inception of earth, people engaged themselves for developing itself so that people get all the necessary things, which they need. Some people argues that human activity is destroying the earth and other group opposes that view and believes that all these activity of human being are making the earth more comfortable for living. In my view, human activity is responsible for damaging the earth for mainly two reasons, which I will elaborate in the following essay.
The first reason is that human activity is damaging the world’s ecosystem. Human being’s striving for making the world a better place for living is solely responsible for deteriorating the balance in the ecosystem. Almighty God has created the world in such a way that all the creations were living in harmony. But then the human activity came to the scene, which acts as external force for the ecosystem. Due to this external force, the nature is not in balance anymore. People are cutting the hill tracts for human habitant, rivers are filling, which caused many species extinct and some other is going to vanished near future. For example, in my country in order to give the place for living, a mountain has been converted into plain land. There were different kinds of animals, trees there, but after this activity all these species have been diminished from our country. As you can see, nature’s balance was not destroyed if there was not interference of human.
Another example is that human activity is responsible for global warming. People are cutting the trees, which play the vital role for making the world livable. In order to tackle the pressure of increasing population, many forests have been destroyed, which causes the earth warmer. Because of global warming, many parts of the world are going under water, natural calamities are frequent than previous time. For instance, few years back an industry was established in my locality. As it is emitting various green house gases, the people living near this industry have to migrate other places. This experience taught me that human activity is making the earth warmer, which making the world less livable.
In conclusion, I believe that human activity is making the world worse for living, although some other opposes this. This is so because human activity is destroying the ecosystem and responsible for global warming, which are making the earth adverse for living. Therefore, we all should aware to preserve our mother nature.
- Altruism 3
- Rembrandt's painting 60
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a Batavia newspaper:The department of agriculture in Batavia reports that the number of dairy farms throughout the country is now 25 percent greater than it was 10 years ago. During this same time period 82
- Many of the world's lesser-known languages are being lost as fewer and fewer people speak them. The governments of countries in which these languages are spoken should act to prevent such languages from becoming extinct. 50
- Endangered species 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 395, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this activity' or 'these activities'?
Suggestion: this activity; these activities
...opposes that view and believes that all these activity of human being are making the earth mor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 618, Rule ID: GOING_TO_VBD[1]
Message: 'Going to' requires the base form: 'vanish'
Suggestion: vanish
...cies extinct and some other is going to vanished near future. For example, in my country...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 34.0 15.1003584229 225% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2197.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 432.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08564814815 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47443093006 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483796296296 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 688.5 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1613562946 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5416666667 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.70833333333 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276505392621 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0955786003873 0.076458572812 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0817048918405 0.0737576698707 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200221478291 0.150856017488 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527930414381 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.