In some nations of EUROPE, some children from age 11 to 13 got to school to learn practical skills that will help them to get a job. Other children stay in schools which provide more general academic education.
What should school so to prepare students for the world of work?
In EUROPE continental, some adolescents obtain practical knowledge study from schools which is beneficial for employment. However, other children acquire theoretical study from educational institutes. This essay will discuss what measures should be undertaken by schools to provide adequate jobs for students.
To begin with, there are a plethora of tangible measures that can provide job after completion of study. Firstly, the flexibility of syllabus would intensify the concentration on study. Therefore, if the subjects are being selected by students, then definitely they gain knowledge of particular subject with deep interest. Thus, it should be an imperative for educational premises to provide such optional subjects. Secondly, the school should be fully equipped with modern equipments such as computers, lab and video conferencing tool. Hence, the possibility of accomplishing practical training at schools will be increased. Despite of this, communication exchange events also polish the students certain characteristics.
Furthermore, the term E-learning should be adopted by schools where students can learn globally subjects, research and skills. For instance, in USA, the E learning prospective has been accepted, all schools have access of virtual memory that enhance knowledge of pupils by delivering audio visual information. A part from that, the counselling of adolescents, can find appropriate ability in particular filed such as singing, painting. Lastly, the sports activities must be applied as compulsory subject in schools. This approach hold two basic key factors, firstly, the students will remain healthy and secondly they can acquire manners such as team spirit, leadership, collaboration and co-operation that will really helpful in their job.
To sum up, no doubt, in EUROPE practical skills has been approached in schools and some has been accepted by students. However, some aspects should be accomplished by educational institutes to provide sufficient atmosphere that will beneficial for obtaining employment in future
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-11-28 | gspreet1010@gmail.com | 84 | view |
- People living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life. What are these problems? Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns? 67
- People are using a lot of online language translation apps. Are there more advantages than disadvantages to such services? 56
- Some people think that modern technology is making people more sociable, while others think it is making them less sociable, discuss both views and give opinion. 89
- In some countries children have very strict rules of behaviour, while in other countries they are allowed to do almost anything they want.To what you extent should children have to follow the rules.Give reasons of yours answers and include any relevant ex 73
- Some people think that it is beneficial to sent young children to nursery school before they go to primary school, while other think that it is good to keep children at home with their parents. Discuss both views and give opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 530, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'holds'.
Suggestion: holds
...lsory subject in schools. This approach hold two basic key factors, firstly, the stu...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, lastly, really, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, for instance, in particular, no doubt, such as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1765.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.88333333333 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08309188244 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8317162487 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.823529412 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6470588235 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0588235294 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296476198829 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895394991727 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691202016869 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200280581851 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0793435971588 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.53 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.