Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In this day and age, it is believed that the workers should be well-dressed in their work places. However, some other people argue that value quality of work is utmost important. In my opinion, both criteria are equally pivotal for employees in organisations.
It is undeniable that dressing smartly is very crucial for employees in their work places. One of the perks of being well-dressed is that it helps people show their professionalism and respectful attitude towards the company and the customers. In other words, this manifests the employees' seriousness for their job which assists them to impress their seniors and colleagues and receive the sympathy from people in the organisations. Furthermore, some organisations even require their officers to wear uniform that gives an assistance to customers to realize which company the employees are working for. For instance, when going to the bank, the staff wearing uniform will helps customers to identify who are the bank's employees to ask for help which may save a great deal of time for them.
On the other hand, it is also obvious that quality of work is one of the main factors that leads a company to the success. For example, in some companies related to online business such as Amazon, Tiki, etc., they reckon that the performance and productivity of their workers is taken priority over the outward appearance since quality of work will importantly contribute to the long-term revenue and profit of organisations. In addition, with some employees who rarely have to attend face-to-face meetings, formal clothes are unnecessary. Instead, they will more pay attention to their work in order to boost their productivity.
In conclusion, although dressing smartly is very important in work places since it is the indication of employees' professionalism and also an office culture, working quality is equally crucial as it is one of the factors to lead a company to the glory. Therefore, if the employees in organisations are conscious to invest in both appearance and working capacity, the organisations will always have a professional and trustworthy image to partners.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-22 | hollandnguyen | 67 | view |
| 2020-08-12 | Anbill | 67 | view |
| 2020-05-27 | Sourabh Mall | 56 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly Others value quality of work above appearance Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 67
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. 56
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 280, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...ers. In other words, this manifests the employees seriousness for their job which assists...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 673, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'help'
Suggestion: help
...he bank, the staff wearing uniform will helps customers to identify who are the banks...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1798.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22674418605 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00004506907 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491279069767 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.801650001 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.428571429 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1428571429 7.06120827912 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331387444183 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125582915098 0.084324248473 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571842164184 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221286881988 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624920249065 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.