Some parents believe that reading books for entertainment is a waste of time for children and they think that their children should only read serious educational books.
What is your opinion?
In recent years, the reading habits of the children have been gaining a great deal of attention among the parents. Most importantly, the issue has been a bone of contention among the parents on spending hours with books for entertainment rather than educational contents. While many parents consider reading books for fun is just wastage of time and the kids should focus on knowledge, however, I would contend that children must get some freedom to entertain themselves with books rather than serious and knowledge-based contents.
On the one hand, the competition for getting good grades are growing day by day. Hence, the parents consider that their kids must spend time wisely and always should focus on education. That is why, to them, entertainment is a less important issue for higher marks and it is wastage of valuable time. Moreover, children, these days are leading their life with the predetermined compact schedule by their parents and teachers. Therefore, literally, they do not have enough time to think about reducing stress with funny books. In relation to this, parents consider reading educational books even in leisure time will help their kids to utilize the time in a best possible approach and making them ready for future battle.
Conversely, some parents consider that the total educational system and the society are trying to push their kids into the unhealthy rat race of getting good marks and ending up with high salaries. In most cases, these creates extreme mental pressure on the psychology of the children. Therefore, these parents are thinking about to break this vicious cycle by giving freedom to their kids. Thus, when it comes to reading comics, storybooks or other funny books for entertainment, they encourage their children more positively. Furthermore, these liberal parents believe that education is required but not in expense of the tender childhood with boring books of geometry or physics. Rather, they feel that reading funny books can be a constructive source of entertainment which is far better than spending time on screen with mobile games.
All things considered, reading educational books in leisure time cannot be a productive approach for developing a better future. Personally, I believe, entertainment is crucial for every kid and pertaining to that context, books are always a harmless friend indeed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-29 | namdev190@gmail.com | 11 | view |
| 2019-08-25 | bhatvishal@ | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-29 | Bhawna Sharma | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-27 | spkute | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-17 | Prabhjot Kaur Bhullar | 67 | view |
- You are unhappy about a plan to make your local airport bigger and increase the number of flights. You live near the airport. Write a letter to your local newspaper. In your letter explain where you live describe the problem give reasons why you do not wa 84
- You are organizing an executive event for the company you work for. Write a letter to the person in charge of a venue that you are considering for the event and ask for detailed information about regarding dates, services and costs. 89
- Some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global scale while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 11
- Your neighbors have recently written to you to complain about the noise from your house flat. Write a letter to your neighbors. In your letter -explain the reasons for the noise -apologize -describe what action you will take 84
- Recommendation letter 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 656, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
... help their kids to utilize the time in a best possible approach and making them ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1996.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 379.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26649076517 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72094227212 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540897097625 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 602.1 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3349940284 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.411764706 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2941176471 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94117647059 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.451247068726 0.244688304435 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138326220894 0.084324248473 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641651948357 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286351262936 0.151304729494 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419721846605 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.