Some parents believe that reading books for entertainment is a waste of time for children and they think that their children should only read serious educational books.
Do you agree or disagree?
It is argued by a significant number of guardians that reading novels and short story books is a time wastage for their pupil and they believe that children should focus only on academic books. I disagree with the idea and consider that reading entertainment books help students in use of words with different context and it helps the brain to become sharper.
To begin with, reading entertainment books create imaginary power; therefore, parents should encourage children to read such books. Story books help children to think in that particular manner and enhance their creativity. For instance, studying novel or short stories have always benefited students in terms of increasing intellectual ability. A recent survey from American organization has revealed that students who are more involved in reading social books are more creative in art and other social aspects. Thus, involving students in reading entertainment books is not a waste of time.
Similarly, reading entertainment books increases hold on a language. Entertainment books are more interesting as compared with academic books, regular habit of reading story books improve the language in terms of vocabulary, collocation of words and many other segments can be learnt with regular practice of reading. A good command on language benefits in academics while expressing thoughts in studies. For instance, reading English novels daily benefits reader in learning synonyms and the use of different words with respect to context.
To conclude, I disagree with the notion because of the reasons mentioned in above paragraphs. In future, the school curriculum may include entertainments books with academics to improve the language learning of students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-29 | namdev190@gmail.com | 11 | view |
| 2019-08-25 | bhatvishal@ | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-29 | Bhawna Sharma | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-27 | spkute | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-17 | Prabhjot Kaur Bhullar | 67 | view |
- Some people think there should be some strict controls about noise. Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 56
- Some people argue that technological inventions, such as mobile phones, are making people socially less interactive. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- More and more people are becoming seriously overweight. Some people say that the price increase of fattening foods will solve this problem. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 73
- Reading is more educational than watching videos or TV. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- Improvements in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations. However, the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such areas. Do you agree or disagree? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 449, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'benefits'' or 'benefit's'?
Suggestion: benefits'; benefit's
... instance, reading English novels daily benefits reader in learning synonyms and the use...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 95, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'In the future'?
Suggestion: In the future
... reasons mentioned in above paragraphs. In future, the school curriculum may include ente...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, similarly, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, to begin with, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1463.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52075471698 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85100270907 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554716981132 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5189880502 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.538461538 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3846153846 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355813376646 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136828814833 0.084324248473 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109652442612 0.0667982634062 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221799205404 0.151304729494 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11899829364 0.056905535591 209% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.