Some people are concerned that children spend too much time on computers-playing games, chatting, and watching videos. But all this time is actually good preparation for children, who will have to spend many hours working on computers throughout their education and their work lives.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience.
Kids today utilize most of their time playing games and watching videos on the computer. Some people feel that they are wasting time by doing so, while, few others believe that spending more time on computers will be helpful for their studies and future jobs. I completely disagree with the view that computers are needed for all future jobs and studies.
Firstly, Children get addicted when they spend endless hours in front of the computer playing video games. Moreover, this will lead to multiple health-related issues such as vision problems and obesity. For instance, in a recent survey, it was found that around 50 per cent of the children were using spectacles, and the cause for this was the high usage of computers. Another issue is that due to sedentary working, kids do not indulge in any physical activities and become obese at a young age. With these impacts, a kid’s future will be unhealthy and can hurt his career.
Secondly, it is a wrong assumption that every kids’ future is interlinked to computers. There are many other imperative career aspects in life. There are many other myriads of careers that require other skills. Indeed, if a youngster wants to become an artist or sportsmen it is not necessary that he must be equipped with computer skills, rather he must incorporate the skills that are required in his field of work. For example, Sachin Tendulkar was a school dropout and barely had any computer skills but today he is considered the best cricketer in the world. Therefore, one should ascertain what skill must be acquired in his career.
To conclude, in today's technological era basis computer skills are vital but it does not mean that all future and jobs are dependants on machine assistances.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-19 | sharath957 | 78 | view |
- Children can learn effectively from watching television, which is why it should be encouraged at school and at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 78
- Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets there is no need to go to cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed, films need to be seen in cinema. 80
- Some People Think That Exercise Is The Key To Health While Others Feel That Having A Balanced Diet Is More ImportantDiscuss both views and give opinion. 73
- Some people argue that a growing number of young people spend too much time in watching TV Why does this phenomenon happen And what kinds of activities should be encouraged to them 42
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines.Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages? 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1455.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94897959184 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55585256631 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8675479432 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254343687501 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749023163512 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0769139560843 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147389026151 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0952160063627 0.056905535591 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.