Some people are making new friends by socializing network websites and internet chat rooms. Some people say that this is a good thing. Other people opine that people should make new friends by face to face chat. Discuss both views and given your own opinion.
There is an increase in those who utilize social media networks to found new friends, but some individuals are arguing that new friendships should be bond In real life and face to face situation. Although we are living in the internet domination world, I personally side with the latter view. In this essay, I would discuss both views and conclude.
On one hand, finding fresh friends online has some benefits. Firstly, it is so easy and time effective. People can connect with each other in no time and there is no limitation on when they want to chat. They do not need an open cafe to hangout and chat. Secondly, it is not restricted by national boundaries, they can connect with any person in the globe without even moving out of their home. Thirdly, people with the same point of view or interest can easily follow each other on the social networks like Facebook, or instagram. This gives them a better start to talk and click.
On the other hand, despite all the benefits that comes with the an online friend, cyber crimes are increasing all over the world thank to these social network websites. As all the connections with an online friend is through the internet, everyone can easily fake their profile. We are hearing a plethora of credit card hacks and other crimes that are happening via these websites. It is a common view that the real friends are those who can be there when you need them. Friends who has face to face relationship always has a deeper bond, and can be there for you in thick and thin. Also, these friendships tend to last longer.
To sum up, I strongly believe real life and face to face friends are a better choice. Despite that we all have some online friends and they could be beneficial, at the end of the day we call a real friend if we are in trouble.
- The media pay too much attention to the lives and relationships of celebrities such as actors, singers are footballers. They should spend more time reporting the lives of ordinary people instead.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- some people say that popular tourist destinations are receiving bad effects from travelers why does this happen and what can be done to resolve this 73
- You cannot go to a company where you got an offer Write a letter to the HR supervisor to explain the reason why you decline the offer express you gratitude explain you like your current job very much 84
- Some people are making new friends by socializing network websites and internet chat rooms Some people say that this is a good thing Other people opine that people should make new friends by face to face chat Discuss both views and given your own opinion 56
- When people move to another country some of them decide to allow the customs of the new country Others prefer to keep their own customs Compare these two choices Which one do you prefer Why 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 151, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'bonded'?
Suggestion: bonded
... arguing that new friendships should be bond In real life and face to face situation...
^^^^
Line 5, column 61, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'an' is left.
Suggestion: the; an
...espite all the benefits that comes with the an online friend, cyber crimes are increas...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 283, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ryone can easily fake their profile. We are hearing a plethora of credit card hacks and oth...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1473.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53230769231 5.12529762239 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3265974343 2.80592935109 83% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529230769231 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3507087672 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.8333333333 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0555555556 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38888888889 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268247679442 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749138983743 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553330142289 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160560947612 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040748184082 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.0946893788 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 50.2224549098 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.3001002004 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 12.4159519038 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.