Some people argue that governments should stop supporting the professional sporting events and cultural programs, and instead support schools from where students can take up sports and arts
Every society in general, and every nation in particular has a definite sense and sentiments of sporting and cultural preferences. The members of such society or country propagate these tilts through their active interest in the connected events.
First of all, it is true that the governments spend enormous amounts of money on these events. Interestingly, this spending is justified because these events not only entertain audience they also generate abundance income. If a country is least interested in organization of a global sporting event, it can significantly diminish its image before the world.
For example, such events is the Oktoberfest celebrated in Munich city of Bavarian Germany. It is a sixteen to eighteen days long affair and attracts participants in excess of five million from across the globe. After Oktoberfest event, Germany’s tourism industry has boosted beyond limits. Furthermore, sporting and cultural events encourage healthy competition between the members of a society. As a result, it prevents various social evil’s appearances that may otherwise gnaw at the roots of the civilization.
On the other hand, there is some truth in the argument that governments should support schools so that children can polish their sports and arts skills from an early age. However, there is an argument that authorities only look after sports and culture up to schools levels. In like manner it may interrupt studies and students will divert towards fun and activities rather than focus on their syllabus.
There is some truth certainly in the argument that governments should support schools so that children can polish their sports and arts skills from an early age. In fact, most governments in the world already do this. However, the argument that governments should withdraw their support for professional sporting and cultural events and instead support only schools is not easy to justify.
To conclude, it can safely be deduced that spending considerable sum of money on sports and cultural events not only nourishes healthy thinking, but also promotes the soft image of the society worldwide. It would rather not to be waste of thought to support sports and arts on school level, since they hold their country's future success.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-03-02 | MariaOvais | 84 | view |
| 2018-03-02 | MariaOvais | 56 | view |
| 2018-03-02 | MariaOvais | 61 | view |
| 2018-03-02 | MariaOvais | 67 | view |
| 2018-03-02 | MariaOvais | 67 | view |
- Some people argue that governments should stop supporting the professional sporting events and cultural programs, and instead support schools from where students can take up sports and arts 84
- Some people argue that governments should stop supporting the professional sporting events and cultural programs, and instead support schools from where students can take up sports and arts 56
- Some people argue that governments should stop supporting the professional sporting events and cultural programs, and instead support schools from where students can take up sports and arts 78
- Some people argue that governments should stop supporting the professional sporting events and cultural programs, and instead support schools from where students can take up sports and arts 78
- Some people argue that governments should stop supporting the professional sporting events and cultural programs, and instead support schools from where students can take up sports and arts 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, so, for example, in fact, in general, in particular, as a result, first of all, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1935.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38997214485 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77107118547 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529247910864 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 578.7 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6301445793 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.5 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9444444444 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.11111111111 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.39085206864 0.244688304435 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112704358534 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115899916275 0.0667982634062 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19467307933 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131618389529 0.056905535591 231% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.