Some people argue that higher taxes should be collected from industries causing higher industrial pollution, whereas others argue that there are better ways to deal with it. Discuss both view and give opinion
In today’s industrialized world where environmental pollution caused by industries have reached unprecedented levels. To encounter this, certain section of the society recommends imposing higher corporate taxes. Whereas, others have contrasting views, of imposing threshold pollution levels irrespective of taxes. In my opinion, imposing additional taxes is a good option. However, for optimum results, a combination of both stricter policies alongside higher taxes must be imposed.
Firstly, tax revenues generated from industries can be better utilized by governments on repairing the damages made to the environment. Furthermore, money from taxes can be utilized in research activities, with an aim of reducing pollution. Secondly, as a result of mandating higher taxation policies, companies shall strive to improvise the production processes, with an aim of reducing the pollution. Consequently, pollution would be drastically reduced at first place. For instance, Coal India which is India’s largest producer of coal, has successfully re-engineered the coal production process, as a result of strict financial repercussions from government.
On the other hand, simple step of imposing higher taxes is not an optimum solution, as in current competitive world, companies can exploit this policy by multiplying the production without considering the environmental damages, as long as they are capable of paying increased tax rates. This trend would have devastating results in longer run. For instance, plastic products are known to be biggest destructor of ecosystem, at the same time it highly lucrative business. Therefore, allowing plastic producers to produce plastic without restrictions can lead to serious environmental destructions.
To conclude, even though collecting higher taxes on environmental grounds is a good option. However, a maximum threshold of allowed pollution must be imposed on industries. More importantly, such a fine balance between tax and threshold would allow governments to come up with solutions to fight back the calculated the expected threshold level of pollution.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-23 | eyraen | 84 | view |
| 2019-04-02 | Mike_Moody | 56 | view |
| 2019-04-02 | Mike_Moody | 89 | view |
- Women can do everything that men can and they even do it better They also can do many things that men cannot But it is a fact that their work is not appreciated as much as men s although they have to sacrifice a lot for their family and career It is said 92
- Some people think that all children should learn geography in school However some others think that it is more important to learn subjects that are more relevant to life What is your opinion 75
- You recently received a letter from a friend asking for advice about whether to go to college or try to get a job. You think he/she should get a job. 89
- Solar energy is becoming more and more popular as a source of household energy in many countries around the world. Why is this? What are the advantageous and disadvantageous of solar energy? 73
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, It is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 389, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'be the biggest'.
Suggestion: be the biggest
...instance, plastic products are known to be biggest destructor of ecosystem, at the same ti...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, for instance, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1820.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.9477124183 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26251177522 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604575163399 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2301252855 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.058823529 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219153504655 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693728352077 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508167955581 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130462321092 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482766086396 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.93 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.26 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.