Children are our future generations, and nurturing them need to evaluate a wide range of factors that may have serious impacts on their personality and also the society as a whole. Therefore, variety of measures regarding the best ones to how bringing them up are debated.
On the one hand, the critics opposing to let children choose their interested items by themselves may think about buying matters without any supervision done by parents. For example, if a child grasps everything he/she wants, the results will be a spoiled offspring, avoiding regarding any persuasive reason to ignore the item that she/he wants is interested in. Furthermore, reaching to anything that they want becomes more convenient in their mind, and to own their loved ones the ignorance of other people would become easy.
On the other hand, those who think about the children’s own decisions in choosing items believe that if the selection is done under supervision of parents, it can have beneficial effects in their personal and social life. For instance, they could improve their self-confidence and become more independent, causing to increase their social activities such as interactions with other people and their peers. Furthermore, it can causes to be more active in different communities and share their problems with their parents in different situations. Then, families can show them the horizon of live honestly and let them have strong personality to overcome any probable bullying by other children and avoid becoming socially naïve. Finally, this can make the children more disciplined and also responsible to think about solving problems of other people and helping them considerably and effectively.
All in all, I tend to side with proponents of whom that agree with letting children choose their items themselves because its benefits outweighs the drawbacks.
- In many countries schools have severe problems with student behaviour What do you think are the causes of this What solutions can you suggest 87
- Improvement in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations. However, the government of richer nation should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such area. 73
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both these vi 85
- In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this 100
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 315, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'increasing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: increasing
...ce and become more independent, causing to increase their social activities such as interac...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 427, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'cause'
Suggestion: cause
...le and their peers. Furthermore, it can causes to be more active in different communit...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, furthermore, honestly, if, may, regarding, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3593220339 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79620952446 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579661016949 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 31.75604322 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.727272727 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8181818182 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06120827912 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267235100119 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101794285546 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714297362085 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134281194603 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0836961829136 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.