It is a highly debatable and sensitive issue of society, whether government should look after the retired population or they should have individual funds to fulfill their needs. Many political parties even promise to provide retirement allowances. However, I believe that any government can not manage to provide financial help to such a diverse old demographic and everyone should have sufficient savings to take care of themselves.
There are myriad arguments that why the government should not take care of its public, even after completion of their job tenure. And primary one is that there is huge diversity in lifestyle and requirements of everyone. Therefore any government can neither provide financial help based on old people’s necessity nor can give a fixed amount to everyone regardless of their necessity because that will be unfair to those who worked with high skills yet receive the same allowance as a lower skilled person. For instance, any countries with a high population, like India, have wide bands of all demographics. Such countries are already making efforts to run the economy the best way for better opportunities for their youth, who will generate revenue for the country. If such countries start taking care of elders, then it will be additional burden to the economy.
On the other hand, primarily, everyone has a different pay scale based on their skill set in today’s cutthroat competition. Moreover, there are more private job opportunities compared to government jobs. This leads to the immense scope of improvement for all the individuals and they can bring up their salary. As a result, it’s now an individual’s choice on their expense and savings portion of the salary. For example, based on consideration of future expenses and requirements, one can save more from their salary and can help themselves in the future. However, Government can help the public by providing expert advice on how and what portion of a salary should be saved. Additionally, government can deduct a minor portion of one’s salary and return it when he retires in the form of pensions, of course, which will be one’s individual wealth only.
Based on the aforementioned arguments, it’s clear that if anyone manages his finance smartly, he can take care of himself in the forthcoming time. Furthermore, it will be in the interest of a nation as well as the national government can utilize the retirement allowance for better constructive purposes.
- Some people believe that government should take care of old people and provide financial support after they retire Others say individual should save during their working years to fund their own retirement What is your opinion Give reasons for your answer 67
- Today many young people change their jobs or careers every few years What do you think are the reasons for this Do you think the advantages outweigh its disadvantages 73
- The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period 67
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- the graph and table below given information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 222, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...lifestyle and requirements of everyone. Therefore any government can neither provide fina...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, for example, for instance, of course, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2081.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 401.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18952618454 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.898871367 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543640897756 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 672.3 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1116038409 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.611111111 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2777777778 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.27777777778 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308901314904 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0930610722091 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650172853638 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193238549059 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0881332484815 0.056905535591 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.