Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engines, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should work in any country they wish. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experiences. Write at least 250 words.
In recent years, there is an argument that professional workers, such as doctors and engines should be preserved in the specific countries they are educated. However, others have argued that they should have a chance to choose where they actually dream to work and live. Although people who are experts in medicine or engineering should be kept due to the enormous benefits they bring, I strongly believe that they should have the freedom to select the country they pursue to devote themselves. This essay will analyze why keeping them around the country has numerous advantages and why they should be free to make a decision about where to work because they can be affected by some detrimental situations such as medical problems
It is undeniable that conserving them within the areas they had training programs is vital due to some reasons. For example, a variety of world-famous advanced technologies made by engines are kept in such automotive companies to make a profit with the monopoly technology. Moreover, when we have communication and collaboration in the mother language is more easily to boost technological development.
Nevertheless, human-being throughout developed and developing countries will be impacted adversely by severe illness when there is an epidemic. For example, there will be a shortage of doctors or nurses who support the medical sector to provide proper treatment in vaccinations or injections to patients. Therefore, to avoid such situations worse, authorities will hire foreign workers who work in this field to acquire assistance without geographical barriers.
On the whole, it is thought that advanced workers should still stay after having professional curricula, to my mind, they are free to work in the area they pursue is better since making the choice to work somewhere is significant for the improvement of their knowledge and skills.
To conclude, even though there are practical merits when professionals are preserved in the country where they finished their professionalism; on the other hand, they should work anywhere that they have dreamed about and the place gives them opportunities for career prosperous.
- Some businesses say that no one can smoke cigarettes in any of their offices Some governments have banned smoking in all public places Do you agree or disagree with this 84
- In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies 73
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional culture are incompatible To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 78
- tu
- At the present time the population of some countries includes relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 288, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...dream to work and live. Although people who are experts in medicine or engineering shou...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, for example, such as, on the whole, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1831.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36950146628 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9494848345 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554252199413 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.4474160973 49.4020404114 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.454545455 106.682146367 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0 20.7667163134 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0909090909 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.442712935739 0.244688304435 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16384016442 0.084324248473 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12034664292 0.0667982634062 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228261855215 0.151304729494 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143642659865 0.056905535591 252% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.0946893788 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.55 50.2224549098 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.46 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.