Tourism plays a vital role in modern civilization, allowing people from different cultures to meet and exchange their way of life. This activity does have its own demerits. This forces some people to recommend restricting tourist to visit certain places, which seems to be a controversial tactic. This essay will discuss its advantages and disadvantages and will provide a concluding view.
On the one hand, those who support the ban argue that tourists being outsiders are unable to understand the culture and heritage of the country. Travelers may be reluctant to follow local culture and traditions and bring their culture, causing a possible erosion to local culture. Travelers may litter or even worse, damage the places. The example can be seen in the Taj Mahal monument located in Agra, where many ignorant tourists have inscribed their names or signs, damaging the aesthetic beauty of the monument. Furthermore, being unaware of the significance of certain places or customs, they may hurt the sentiments of local community unknowingly, leading to anger as well as anxiety among the local population. Therefore, they advise that tourists should be banned from at least some places, which are regarded as sacred due to religious or historical reasons. This may lead to a win-win situation for tourists as well as indigenous people.
On the other hand, those who oppose the ban question its effectiveness. They suggest that the world has become so interconnected due to technology, it is practically impossible to restrict the cultural convergence. In addition to helping the local economy, tourists also bring ideas as well as innovations which can be useful for the locals, providing an added advantage. In fact, these type of restrictions, cannot save damages done by local visitors.
Moreover, tourism may greatly affect by this ban, because most of the time, these places are the main attractions for the tourists, hurting the local economy.
In conclusion, banning tourists from certain places looks an attractive option at first, this tends to be ineffective in long-run due to different reasons discussed in this essay. From my point of view, we should refrain from using this tactic and should look for other solutions to protect local culture and traditions as well as the historically significant places, because disadvantages of this tactic seem to outweigh the advantages.
- Some people believe that to protect local culture, tourism should be banned in some areas whereas others think that change is inevitable and banning tourism will have no benefits.Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 84
- It is becoming increasingly popular to have a year off between finishing school and going to university. What are the advantage and disadvantages of this? 56
- Many people believe that the use of new technology improves lives of employees. Others think it is a disadvantage for them. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
- Since population is rapidly increasing in the world, there is an acute shortage of houses in the big cities. Should we construct multistory buildings in the existing cities or should we develop suburbs and new cities in the countryside? Give your opinion 84
- The tendency of news reports in the media to focus more on problems and emergencies than on positive developments is harm to the individuals and the society as a whole To what extent do you agree or disagree 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 298, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ich seems to be a controversial tactic. This essay will discuss its advantages and d...
^^^^
Line 6, column 31, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...isitors. Moreover, tourism may greatly affect by this ban, because most of the time, the...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, at least, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2022.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 382.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29319371728 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84865833468 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570680628272 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 628.2 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 5.43587174349 258% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6863318008 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.333333333 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.22222222222 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1999830829 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0615186444522 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390865089868 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112590368183 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251187156818 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.