Some people believe that teenagers should concentrate on all school subjects. But others believe that teenagers should focus on the subjects that they are good at or that they find the most interest. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
A child's mind is extremely receptive when they are young and this time-frame is regarded as the optimal time to subject them to multifarious subjects. While some educators stress on the fact that academic syllabus must be inundated with all the up to date subjects, others regard this to be severely flawed and opine that pupils must be let to select subjects that suits their passion. Both these arguments need proper scrutinization before framing a conclusion.
To begin with, educationalists quote that a child's education must comprise of multiple study subjects. They ascribe this trend to children having a foreseeable future. Furthermore, they also cite that in today's ever changing technology, it is impertive to be more than an expert in all study areas rather than confining children to a few ones. Mechanical Engineering course, for instance, comprises of different aspects of engineering such as computers, oceanography, telecommunications and so on. This ensures those graduates have a much wider probability of employment rather than their counterparts whose study is restricted to a few streams.
On the contrary, although there are multifarous cons associated with the above trend, of late, this is proving to be defective as it supresses teenagers to a larger extent resulting in academic failures. To counter this flaw, psychologists strongly reckon that screening a child's desire and permitting them to study their favourable streams of study can undoubtedly yeild a magical impact on the teenager be it on his or her intellectuals or in the academics. Many scientists of the past, for example, have followed their passion to study selective subjects and experiment it. They have never felt in the least bit pressurized but instead, found it way too interesting and eventually ventured to become well renowned researchers and philosophers such as Netwon, Pascal and others to name a few.
To sum up, although many senior lecturers cite that students must learn all the subjects as prescribed by respective study mediums to have better job prospects, others consider this practice to over-stress students most times. Instead, they advocate the view that identifying teenagers' aspirations and helping them to accomplish those which will yield greater dividends later.Gauging both views I strongly advocate the latter to be the must successful and believe that the positive spin-offs of this practice to be enormous.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 67, Rule ID: COMPRISE_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprise' or 'consist of'?
Suggestion: comprise; consist of
...ists quote that a childs education must comprise of multiple study subjects. They ascribe t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 390, Rule ID: COMPRISES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of
...nical Engineering course, for instance, comprises of different aspects of engineering such a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 377, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Gauging
...hich will yield greater dividends later.Gauging both views I strongly advocate the latt...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, well, while, for example, for instance, such as, on the contrary, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2058.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 383.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37336814621 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06423537138 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595300261097 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 639.0 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.8962416198 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.0 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3571428571 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147846041985 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0473488997876 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0316157404254 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0932528367274 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331371044134 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.