Some people believe that teenagers should concentrate on all lessons while others think they should focus on subjects in which they are stronger and they find interesting. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
whether concentrating on all subjects or on those in which children are more interested continues to be a rather long-running and protracted controversy. It is sometimes argued that teenagers should learn all lessons provided in schools, set against this, is the view that it would be better for them to focus just on those subjects appealing to them more. There are, however, valid arguments on both sides, which I will discuss in this essay.
On the one hand, those who support focusing on all subjects would cite the fact that students could have the opportunity to get familiar with numerous subjects such as Mathematics, Physics, Geography, Arts and so forth. This will help them discover their fields of interest to pursue in the future. There are, for example, many adults who are not satisfied with their professions because they did not have enough acquaintance with all subjects to select the one they were more enthralled or had more ability in doing them. Furthermore, the proponents would say that people are likely to confront indeliberately with diverse and unpredictable encounters. Therefore, so useful are what they have learned before. Thus, acquaintance with all lessons could broaden the children’s horizons to make correct decisions in critical situations in their future lives.
Supporters of concentrating on the subjects in which teenagers demonstrate more enthusiasm or strength, On the other hand, point out the less time they need to consume to become what they dream. Doors of success usually will be opened for such teenagers very soon. Examples can be seen in individuals who established successful start-ups or won international awards due to the fact that they had embarked on the learning process from their early childhood. Likewise, It might be said that learning a variety of subjects would be a waste of countless time and energy. Hence, the second view could be significantly more efficient leading to sooner success and more satisfaction.
On balance, whereas some people assert that children should learn all lessons, opponents insist on focusing only on those in which they are more interested or talented. Weighing both thoughts, I am of the conviction that logically the first belief is more powerful.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-21 | amirhadi.alsadi | 73 | view |
| 2018-06-20 | Mehdi.Babaie | 67 | view |
- You cannot go to a company where you got an offer. Write a letter to the HR supervisor to:Explain the reason why you decline the offerExpress your gratitudeExplain why you like your current job very much 73
- Some people think personal car is the best way to travel within cities, while others think bicycles are better.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 77
- Nowadays more and more people want to live by themselves. What are the reasons? Is it a positive or negative trend? 61
- Although more and more people read the news online, some people still use newspaper. Why do you think this is? Which one do you prefer? 56
- Students in school and university learn far more from lessons with their teachers compared to other sources, such as television or the internet. Do you agree or disagree? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whether
whether concentrating on all subjects or on tho...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 213, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[7]
Message: The adverb 'usually' is usually put between 'will' and 'be'.
Suggestion: will usually be
...ecome what they dream. Doors of success usually will be opened for such teenagers very soon. Ex...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, hence, however, if, likewise, second, so, therefore, thus, whereas, for example, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1898.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24309392265 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87974647772 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552486187845 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9235570043 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.625 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9375 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256108401671 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807722983321 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696376613813 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164957940494 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270360033804 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.