Some people believe that there is a reduction in air travel in the future. Do you think this trend as positive or negative development?
One of the major break-through of science and technology was invention of aeroplanes. With everything, if used excessively can have a negative impact while if used moderately can help the humans and society. I believe airplanes are helping a lot of people and economy of several countries on a daily basis and reduction of it will impose a negative impact.
Technology has changed every aspect of our life and one of it is the way we travel. In ancient times people travel through horses and camels and it took several days and additionally they could not travel far in the land. Air travel has made it possible to go people anywhere in the world in the nick of time, which has radically changed the tourism industry on which economy of several countries depends. E.g. Dubai was unending desert in the near past. They made several tourism resorts on the beach and made it one of the most exotic and sought-after beaches in the world. After flourishing of tourism, the economic condition of it has radically improved and living standard of local Arabians has seen new heights. Secondly, people could travel long distances in a shorter period of time. This saved an incredible amount of time, as time is money and it should be spent carefully. Executives travel faraway countries to form business ties and flourish their Business internationally.
On the other hand, increased use of fossil fuels and deforestation for residential apartments and industries has caused a serious threat to our environment. Airplanes use tons of natural resources for a single flight, which in turn depleting them and increasing air pollution in the form of noise, oil spills and emission of gasses. These oil spills were killing marine inhabitants and cutting of trees are making several species extinct. Reduction of air travel can prove to be a marvelous step towards saving the planet and its inhabitants. However, as this means of travel is extremely expensive, only rich people could afford it, by decreasing, it could only have minimal effect on the environment. Other means of travel like cars and buses are used by majority of the population of the world as are cheaper and affordable by ordinary people.
In conclusion, air travel is a luxury for affluent community as well as essential for the economy. I believe we should use it considerably to boost economic condition, but on the other hand reduce air travel within countries and try to use other means where it is possible.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-17 | Gagan Cheema | 61 | view |
| 2019-09-22 | b.ielts | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | Saira Faiz | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | Saira Faiz | 73 | view |
- Many people believe that university students should study a full range of subjects, instead of some specific subjects.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this viewpoint? 61
- Modern buildings change the character and appearance of towns and cities. The government should insist that new buildings be built in traditional styles to protect cultural identity. 84
- Modern lifestyles mean that many parents have little time for their children. Many children do not get as much attention from their parents as children did in the past. 73
- Children brought up in families with less money are better prepared for life than those from wealthy families. 61
- Some believe that global warming is the most pressing environmental problem which we have at the moment; others believe that deforestation has a more devastating impact on our world. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 777, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ould travel long distances in a shorter period of time. This saved an incredible amount of tim...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, e.g., however, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 10.4138276553 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2063.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 416.0 315.596192385 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95913461538 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77293318035 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53125 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 664.2 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6194961735 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.15 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179316970683 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516200986297 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462122370424 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107964945613 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00467634074618 0.056905535591 8% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.