Some people claim that not enough of the waste from home is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste.
Nowadays, more and more items are wasted into the landfill or water sources every day. Many people argue that this situation happens because people are not serious to recycle their garbage at home. As a result, there should be legal restrictions on recycling to reduce waste. I completely agree with this argument and also give one more suggestion to solve the issue in a better way.
On the one hand, adopting official rules on household rubbish is essential to make a significant contribution to the increase in recycled waste products. When these rules are on wide publicity, they will strongly remind people of being serious to categorize garbage; otherwise, a strict fine will be given to individuals who do not follow the rules. For example, instead of throwing away clothes and electronic devices to the landfill or the sea, now household families have to collect these items and then give them back to the environmental staff to be solved in right places. Thanks for that, recycled items are increasing while the environment is protected better.
On the other hand, beside the main rules, the government should also have several soft policies to encourage people to recycle waste voluntarily. Too much strict restrictions may cause escalating frustrations to individuals and deter them from the sense of the freedom; therefore, soft policies sometimes seems to be more successful than strict rules in solving problems. A friendly policy could be of giving lucrative financial incentives for individuals who achieve the biggest number of recycling in a year. This method not only makes individuals feel happy when following rules but also give environment-protection campaigns a chance to be widely promoted among people.
In conclusion, I agree that it is necessary for the policy makers to pose requirements on recycling waste so that the number of recycled household items will be increased. However, some less strict solutions should also be applied to make people not feel serious and anxious when following rules.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-22 | ndbro17 | 73 | view |
| 2021-05-22 | ndbro17 | 73 | view |
| 2020-12-27 | Hanachan123456789 | 78 | view |
| 2020-04-17 | Shraddanand | 73 | view |
| 2020-02-24 | saipriyanka | 73 | view |
- The tradition that the family gets together to eat meals is disappearing What are the reasons What are the impacts 78
- Some people say that advertising encourages us to buy things that we really do not need Others say that advertisements tell us about new products that may improve our lives Which viewpoint do you agree with 73
- Some people claim that museums and art galleries are not needed today because everyone can see historical objects or art works by computer Do you agree or disagree 73
- In many countries not enough students are choosing to study science subjects What are the causes And what will be the effects on society 84
- Some people believe that young people know about international pop and movie stars but know very less about famous people from the history in their own country Why is this How can more interest be created in young people to gain more knowledge about their 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 674, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nce to be widely promoted among people. In conclusion, I agree that it is necess...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1709.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22629969419 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87998717734 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56880733945 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1997492211 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.071428571 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3571428571 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295635960606 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109180717096 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644827498038 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197711574296 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382954030964 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.