Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
Recycling wastes produced at home may not been done enough according to some people, reason why they think governments should make it a legal requirement. In my opinion, I do believe that there is a need to establish laws to encourage recycling in households in order to foster the waste segregation, but there is also needed local government laws to oblige them to build specific places to where the different type of wastes are sent instead of the landfill.
On one hand, waste segregation laws could be argue because some governments do not offer any segregated transportation for them, so it would not have sense to collect the garbage and transport it to the landfill as a final disposal. However, these type of legislation would be useful to establish it in places where people do not have the culture of recycling. In Cali, for example, where citizens usually pack their wastes in plastic bags without caring for separating the trash by colors. Hence, laws would help regulate this aspect of the solid waste management system and to increase the amount of waste recycled as well.
On the other hand, building waste facilities besides landfills would certainly increase the trash that is collected in cities or communities in general; therefore, local governments’ laws are also significant because they would require the administration of the cities to offer technology for waste recovery after collecting the segregated trash from the households. For instance, organized countries that have environmental issues as a foremost factor of their development, have a complete structure to ensure a well waste management such technological parks where trash are converted into different products or even supplies for industries.
To conclude, I believe laws are necessary to improve the recycling activity at home, because these would help people segregate the wastes and would also have the governments to work for their local needs related to waste management by offering an accurate treatment instead of final disposal of useful wastes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-22 | ndbro17 | 73 | view |
| 2021-05-22 | ndbro17 | 73 | view |
| 2020-12-27 | Hanachan123456789 | 78 | view |
| 2020-04-17 | Shraddanand | 73 | view |
| 2020-02-24 | saipriyanka | 73 | view |
- Modern communications mean that it’s no longer necessary to write letters.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 11
- Not so many people use a bicycle although it has many benefits Why is this the case How to encourage people to use bicycles as a main transport 93
- Not so many people use a bicycle although it has many benefits. Why is this the case? How to encourage people to use bicycles as a main transport? 67
- Students learn more from their school teachers than from other sources such as the internet or television To what extent you agree or disagree with this statement 50
- Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills.Do you agree or disagree? 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 205, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "needs related" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'relating' or 'to be related'.
Suggestion: relating; to be related
...vernments to work for their local needs related to waste management by offering an accu...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in general, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1730.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2743902439 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91254134478 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545731707317 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 20.2975951904 177% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 87.7451416122 49.4020404114 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 192.222222222 106.682146367 180% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.4444444444 20.7667163134 175% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.2222222222 7.06120827912 216% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299878096096 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133125467303 0.084324248473 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730389965995 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197676067054 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0725657624512 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.6 13.0946893788 165% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.48 50.2224549098 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 11.3001002004 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.88 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 9.78957915832 189% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.1190380762 162% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.