In the contemporary world, recycling gains more importance day after day because it is seen like a duty to the countries. Even though recycling of domestic waste has already started, some people think that the amount of domestic waste that is recycling is not sufficient and there must be a legal rules to increase the consciousness of people about recycling. In my viewpoint, I strongly advocate that strict rules are needed to increase recycling.
First and foremost, recycling can not be successfully accomplished by just one or two people. But, with the help of law, people can be forced to contribute recycling. Firstly, people do it because of being mandatory and not wanting to pay fines but after that it will turn to habits. Strict rules can change the public attitude towards recycling positively.
In addition, most people are aware that recycling is the best way to preserve our environment, however few people exert the effort to do so. For instance, there is bottle recycling machines in Germany and people bring their bottles to take deposit after they used. This procedure can be implemented all in Germany because it is rule and people must obey this.
In conclusion, peoples awareness can be increased by laws because it is the most powerful technique used by governments.
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem? 73
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much as information as possible in scientific research, business and academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too invaluable to be shared freely.Discuss both views and five yo 73
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters ( such as food, clothes, and entertainment) is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is imp 61
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, so, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1085.0 1615.20841683 67% => OK
No of words: 215.0 315.596192385 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04651162791 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78365778716 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 176.041082164 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586046511628 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 506.74238477 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5774223141 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6363636364 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5454545455 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.81818181818 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281974679679 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102761182382 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708483095492 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166997269965 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0644364001929 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 78.4519038076 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.