Some people say that in all level of education, from primary school to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills, do you agree or disagree?
This is not a deniable fact that much time is needed for practical exposure alongside theory learnings. A group of people is of the view that at all learning stages teacher focuses on theory or concept understanding and practical work is neglected. I completely agree to this school of thought. I will support my view with valid arguments and examples.
To begin with, unfortunately, our study structure focuses on book learning instead of getting hands on experience. Consequently, when students steps into practical life, they face competency issues of performing different task they had learnt at academic level. For instance, an MBA student will not be able to fill a tax forms, furthermore, an electrical engineer will not be able to fix a light bulk until taught.
To elucidate the argument further, currently teacher focuses on teaching the content written in books rather than realizing the importance of showing practical example or getting the concept physically performed. To illustrate this further, at college level, while I had everyday class of computer; I got to attend computer lab only once a week to practice the language codes we learnt over the week. Due to this improper distribution and lack of practical experience my expertise were not developed to work in a professional environment.
In a nutshell, in this competitive environment, we need to reconsider our method of teaching and include balance portion of theory and practical learning like in developed countries. In western countries their core focus is to get everything practically done through students that give them confidence and sense of achievement.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-07 | sanjugohel | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | amanda.mosby | 11 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | amanda.mosby | 11 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | Tejwani | 11 | view |
| 2019-11-08 | Tejwani | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that teaching children at home is best for a child’s development while others think that it is important for children to go to school.Discuss the advantages of both methods and give your own opinion.Give reasons for your answer and i 78
- If you are given a chance to change what change would you implement in 21 century to make your world a better place to live Discuss a few changes 56
- Every country has poor people and every country has different ways of dealing with the poor.What are some of the reasons for world poverty? How can the poor be helped?Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge 84
- Using a computer every day can have more negative than positive effects on your children.Do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 78
- Most people in the world need to work in order to lead a decent life or even just to survive. Many workers are motivated by money: if the job pays well, they are willing to do it. However, some people are not concerned with the size of their pay packet: t 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 417, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... able to fix a light bulk until taught. To elucidate the argument further, curre...
^^^
Line 4, column 155, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to like'
Suggestion: to like
...ortion of theory and practical learning like in developed countries. In western coun...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, furthermore, if, while, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1382.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27480916031 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02430763776 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.629770992366 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5225092865 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.166666667 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146744330493 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0558472887733 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464527755781 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0909543707259 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058714808105 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.