Some people say that in all level of education from primary schools to universities too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills Do you argree or disagree

Essay topics:

Some people say that in all level of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills.
Do you argree or disagree?

It is argued by some people that today's education system at all levels, from schooling to college, is focusing on theoretical information much more than practical skills. From my point of view, I totally agree with this statement, and in this essay, I express my opinion on it.
Admittedly, the pupils in schools are being taught mostly theory rather than actual practices. This problem is shown by the fact that the proportion of experiment classes occupies a minimal percentage, compared to the total of courses in the school's syllabus. Another proof is that children are being assessed lack critical thinking. This results from the teaching method in which theoretical approaches are more highly esteemed than experimental ones. It is also significant to highlight that practical exposure plays a vital role in training progress because it provides visual understanding and helps pupils remember knowledge deeper, which is crucial for supporting them in higher education. And thus, lack of practical lessons, as a result, might lead to ineffective academic results.
The same issue remains for the higher level of education, university training system. Although undergraduate students are trained in a self-studying approach instead of concentrated classes, theoretical knowledge is still the majority. This measure causes a negative consequence that many students lack social skills essential to their future job. A typical instance for this is that, after graduation, many students fail in job interviews because they had never been instructed about this practical skill before. Moreover, the theory, which students are taught, is often not up-to-date compared to real things that happen in real life. This is true because the updating of educational books always needs time and financial investment. Nevertheless, the best way to fill the gap between knowledge in university and the practical situation is by learning experiment lectures.
In conclusion, at all levels of education, students and pupils are learned theoretical classes more than practical classes, which leads to a lack of necessary skills for higher training or job performance in the future. This issue needs to be improved by increasing practical exposure to reach a more effective education system.

Votes
Average: 8.6 (6 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-07-05 Hemantbali 73 view
Essays by user tiencdh :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 453, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...s is that, after graduation, quite many students failure in job interviews because they ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 876, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to experiment'
Suggestion: to experiment
...ity and practical situation is learning experiment lectures. In conclusion, at all level ...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, thus, in conclusion, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1917.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36974789916 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88118080552 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574229691877 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7297031991 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.764705882 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.82352941176 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164700158086 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0514717219483 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632948114761 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112884786881 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467671698792 0.056905535591 82% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.