Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills.
Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, there is no doubt that knowledge is the most poweful skill a person can possess because it enables to measure your worth in comparison with others. However, some argue that information takes too long to be acquired behind just reading books and this can lead to a non-practical candidate to a job interview. This essay will support the necessity of develop a real skill opposing the traditional learning methods presented in today's institutions.
Firstly, it's important to confront the idead that, so far, universities have been teaching and graduating even more outstanding students by using their traditional ways since the beggining of the classes. The process of earning knowledge is the result of several years of study what contain inside the books and this is how you may highlight yourself from competition when applying for a work. For example, I have been a lawyer since 2012 and know as fact that big firms only hire top grader students because their selection is extremely competitive and want stand out employees; so either you study many years or try other route to be chosen to work in top offices.
On the other hand, I do believe that a gain practice is better than just stay on facts. Today, companies are hiring people based on their accomplishments rather than a bachelor degree in some well-known university. Moreover, millenials are spending less time looking for a diploma and designanting even more effort in short, but very practical lectures online. Thanks to the advance of technology study plataforms like Coursera, EDX and Udemy are transforming the learning procedure by providing real life exercises which can be used as portfolio in the resume; I myself already took several classes about finance, accounting, law and developing management skills that can be used in real life cases.
Therefore, although some might debate about the necessity of study and spend several years in learning institutions to have a chance of being successful, I strongly accredit in a pragmatic method that actually teachs skills to be used in real life scenarios and solve problems rather than graduate youngsters with no experience at all.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-12-07 | sanjugohel | 73 | view |
2019-11-28 | amanda.mosby | 11 | view |
2019-11-28 | amanda.mosby | 11 | view |
2019-11-09 | Tejwani | 11 | view |
2019-11-08 | Tejwani | 73 | view |
- You work at home and have a problem with a piece of equipment that you use for your job.Write a letter to the shop or company which supplied the equipment in your letter.• Describe the problem with the equipment• Explain how this problem is affecting 78
- Your local council is considering closing a sports and leisure centre that it runs, in order to save money. Write a letter to the council. In your letter:- give details of how you and your friends or family use the centre;- explain why the sports and leis 75
- News stories on TV and in newspapers are very often accompanied by pictures.Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words.What is your opinion about this? 78
- You work at home and have a problem with a piece of equipment that you use for your job.Write a letter to the shop or company which supplied the equipment in your letter.• Describe the problem with the equipment• Explain how this problem is affecting 78
- Some people say that it is possible to tell a lot about a person's culture and character from their choice of clothes.Do you agree or disagree? 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, in short, no doubt, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1818.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13559322034 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8015023124 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627118644068 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.5788972231 49.4020404114 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 165.272727273 106.682146367 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.1818181818 20.7667163134 155% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3636363636 7.06120827912 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113922685242 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0421003120163 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.023321928491 0.0667982634062 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0665244138375 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.018327826891 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.