Many people argue that raising a child in a city has more advantages to that of a child raised in countryside. In my opinion, although, countryside offers a clean and traditional environment for children, big cities gives a range of opportunities in terms of better education, jobs and a quality life.
On one hand, a child who is brought up on countryside, is more close to their local cultures and traditions. It is important for everyone to learn their customs, which is only possible if a child is raised in that kind of environment. Also, in towns the air quality is better than that compared to cities, due to less pollution, which is also one of the plus point for raising a child in a pure and fresh environment. Eventhough, with all such environmental quality the major drawback is education. Towns have very limited number of schools that offers good education, and may not have the facility for higher education. So at the end, young people will have to come to the city to pursue further education. For example, in Malaysia 50 percent of children residing in town are home schooled as they do not have enough schools that can accomodate every child in that town.
On the other end, city life has a lot to offer in terms of education, employment and healthcare. There are many government as well as private schools in city offering quality of education. Also, cities are blessed with colleges providing different professional courses. Another important thing is halthcare benefits and its availability. There are many multi-speciality hospitals located across the city, that can be availed by everyone in the time of need. And lastly, getting employment is easy as there are number of jobs available in cities in different areas. The only disadvantage of living in a city is the fast life, one do not get enough time to spend with their family, which is possible on countryside. For instance, people living in a society do not even know their neighbors.
In conclusion, learning of culture and upbringing in pollution free environment is possible in countryside, however, there are more important things that a city offers like education which are essential for a better future of a child.
- Many working people get little or no exercise either during the working day or in their free time and have problems as a result Why do many working people not get enough exercise What can be done about this problem 73
- You have seen an advertisement in an Australian magazine for someone to live with a family for six months and look after their six year old child Write a letter to the parents In your letter Explain why you would like the job give details of why you would 73
- Some people say that advertising encourages us to buy things we really do not need Others say that advertisements tell us about new products that may improve our lives Which viewpoint do you agree with Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans
- In the future more people will choose to go on a holiday in their own country and not travel abroad on holiday Do you agree or disagree 82
- The threat of nuclear weapons maintains the world peace Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy The benefits of nuclear technology far out weight the disadvantages 84
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 108, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun government seems to be countable; consider using: 'many governments'.
Suggestion: many governments
...n, employment and healthcare. There are many government as well as private schools in city offe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, lastly, may, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1840.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 374.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91978609626 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90046199805 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491978609626 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 595.8 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4195763761 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.222222222 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138260612443 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.045444047056 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408773256643 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100301485543 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451809339708 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 108, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun government seems to be countable; consider using: 'many governments'.
Suggestion: many governments
...n, employment and healthcare. There are many government as well as private schools in city offe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, lastly, may, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1840.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 374.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91978609626 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90046199805 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491978609626 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 595.8 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4195763761 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.222222222 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138260612443 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.045444047056 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408773256643 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100301485543 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451809339708 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.