Some people say that the current obsession with technology and the internet means that we are creating a generation of people that have poor social skills. Do you agree with this statement?
Nowadays, humans are becoming too dependent on technology and the Internet for almost every aspect of their lives. Some people believe that this over-dependence on technology will lead to a generation with weak communication skills. I strongly agree with this notion due to some reasons.
On the one hand, thanks to recent technological advancements, individuals are able to interact with one another conveniently and immediately. Regardless of how far two people are physically distanced, devices such as mobile phone, tablet or laptop enable them to communicate together without encountering any difficulties. Furthermore, having access to the Internet and social media including Facebook or Instagram, online users can enjoy expanding their friendship circles instantly by sending friend requests to as many people as they want. Considering these ever-growing impacts of modern facilities on social networks, some are of the opinion that the more we use the technology, the more socialized our generation will become.
However, being obsessed with the Internet and smartphones can surprisingly weaken people’s interpersonal communication skills, for they are less willing to be involved in in-person activities. For example, instead of taking part in parties to connect with friends, one may prefer using online messaging applications on his phone and save the time. In this way, as time passes by, individuals seem to be disconnected from those who live in the physical presence of them, and face-to-face communications will be replaced by the technology inevitably. As a result of this unreasonable replacement, our generation would be more likely to become isolated persons who suffer from poor social skills.
In conclusion, although the modern technology has brought people closer, I believe that the unconscious use of it could affect individuals’ socialization negatively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-08 | daly.shaker.99@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2019-04-10 | enassar | 73 | view |
| 2018-06-17 | parsaeian | 89 | view |
| 2018-06-12 | Aidin_1805 | 58 | view |
- People produce more garbage than in the past Explain how it is affecting us and the measures that could be taken to address the situation 86
- Several languages die every year. Many people feel this is a positive trend and that a world with fewer languages promotes harmony and understanding between people. Analyze both sides of this argument and provide your opinion. 61
- You live in a room in college which you share with another student. However, there are many problems with this arrangement and you find it very difficult to work.Write a letter to the accommodation officer at the college. In the letter,• describe the si 73
- Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult, such as the Sahara desert or the Antarctic? What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourists who visit such places? 84
- You recently became a member of your local leisure centre but you are unhappy with the services and facilities Write a letter to the Centre Manager In your letter explain the circumstances say why you are dissatisfied what action you would like the leisur 64
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1621.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72791519435 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31275429901 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643109540636 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1974735326 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.083333333 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5833333333 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.91666666667 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32635050587 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116934778593 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0764519849433 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194599547229 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0734365382385 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.25 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.