Some people say that the government should not put money on building theaters and sports stadiums. They should spend more money on medical care and education. Do you agree or disagree?
There is a controversial issue about the governmental expenditure on construction of theaters and sports stadiums. Some social workers state that authorities should use this money on supporting health care and education. In this essay, I disagree with their viewpoint.
Let us start with reasons why some social workers argue that the government should stop using money to construct theaters and sports stadiums in favor of medical centers as well as education. The first reason is that the existing facilities cover the demand of population. There is no need to build extra stadiums and theaters, since the current ones abundantly cover the needs of citizens. Another reason is that there is growing number of both patients and students in the hospital and colleges respectively. The government should build more hospitals and colleges with modern equipment instead of unnecessary buildings for entertainment, because current health centers and universities are extremely overcrowded. As a result, by erecting more hospitals and schools, patients and students would experience less inconvenience.
However, some politicians advocate that authorities should give a priority to the construction of theaters and sports stadiums. They justify their point of view with the following arguments. Firstly, there are few places for citizens to spend their leisure time. Cities generally have only one theater, which is seemingly not enough for growing urban population, so it is important to build more theaters to amuse them. Secondly, children need more sports stadiums to satisfy their curiosity for sports. More young people want to do various sports, but there are few places to meet their need. Therefore, governments should allow developers to build more sports facilities, such as stadiums, if it does not want the youth to roam the streets aimlessly.
In conclusion, even though some social workers believe officials should spend more finances on health care and education, I think that it should keep constructing more theater and stadiums as usual for the above mentioned reasons.
- Some people think the best way to solve global environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel.To what extent do you agree? 11
- You recently attended a conference and you would like to give a presentation about the information you gained by attending the conference.Write a letter to your manager asking for permission to give a presentation. In your letter:describe what type of pre 89
- Where do you come from 44
- These days in many countries fewer and fewer people want to become teachers particularly in secondary schools What are the reasons for this and how could the problem be solved 73
- Is freedom of speech necessary in a free society? 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1771.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85903427807 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55900621118 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8987902995 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.176470588 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9411764706 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58823529412 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383559823158 0.244688304435 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105694317188 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0863146086082 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23297184597 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224559049357 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.