Some people say modern innovations bring lot of problem than benefits Do you agree or disagree

Undoubtedly, society is divided into two groups as per the distinct mindset of different people. Therefore, this has become a debatable issue whether advent of technology in all fields developed more issues or benefited human beings to improve their lifestyles. This essay will not only shed light on both perceptions but also my point of view will be elaborated in conclusion.
To commence with the first notion, there are myriad of things to be shared in its favor. First of all, modern technology made a huge impact to develop modern equipment to find out the disease which could have happen in future as well as there is plethora of benefits in preventive and curative medicines such as vaccine for polio and insulin for diabetic patients. Secondly, implementation of technology in agricultural cultivation is another benefit of modern world, to exemplify, seedless fruits and vegetables are harvested in uncountable quantities by western countries using of modern innovations.
Moving towards the second argument of this debate, the first point of this issue is that al most innovations found by the scientist are using against the nature by individuals hence it destroys the eco system which badly affect the survival of other habitat. For instance, there is huge decrease in elephants due to the extinction of forest and people are killing them for tusk to make the product for their entertainment. Apart from this, extraordinary changes in climate ever seen in lifetime due to the high emissions from automotive innovation.
According to my perspective, if people will move forward in this way human being will be eradicated from this earth due to modern innovations so we should go back to ancient days, live with nature, yet it is very hard to adjust because of lifestyle change.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 209, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'happened'.
Suggestion: happened
...o find out the disease which could have happen in future as well as there is plethora ...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, apart from, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12627986348 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84174734308 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648464163823 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.8448255136 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.2 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3 20.7667163134 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.2 7.06120827912 201% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0919155245611 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0316011083196 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327502586601 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0539750639179 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310570193855 0.056905535591 55% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.07 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.