Some people say Supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging for products they sell Others believe that it is the consumer s responsibility to avoid buying products which have a lot of packaging Discuss both views and give your o

Essay topics:

Some people say Supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging for products they sell. Others believe that it is the consumer's responsibility to avoid buying products which have a lot of packaging.

Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Presently, with increased focus towards safeguarding the ecology, people are getting increasingly sensitive towards measures to minimise the production of waste. Packaging remains one of the biggest menaces which is a by-product of civilization in this modern world. In spite of this, people unknowingly are consuming heavy packaged products thereby increasing the disposable waste and hence deteriorating the environment. Here, I would discuss on the two important opinions to curb this menace and would also aim to deduce on the best way forward.

Supermarkets, I believe, is a major point of sale hence their role to influence the consumer cannot be undermined. It is of paramount importance to understand that a reduction in packaging, howsoever small it is, in a regular consumed item will have a butterfly / cascading effect on the nigger picture. For example, making a small change like replacing the plastic covers of bread by paper bags or thinning the plastic of the milk bottles thereby saving on plastic. What goes in favour of supermarkets is, that the packaging is required to give that extra degree of safety to the product which sometimes is a demand of the customer. This becomes the need of the hour for the store to maintain the store credibility. Consumer, though is “king” but has only the options which are available to him at the store. Hence the store does drive the consumer behavior.

Contrary to the thoughts in the above paragraph, there is also a section of people who base their thoughts on the prominent point, demand generates supply. This goes without saying, that the supply would reduce if a section of the consumer would neglect a certain product because of the excess packaging. Eventually, this would become a vicious circle which would result in the end of product life cycle. Either the excess packaging issue would have to be tackled else the product would phase out.

Finally, both the above thoughts need to cohesively work to support the already disturbed ecological imbalance. Nonetheless, I also firmly believe and stand by the statement "Be the change you want to see in the world". In this scenario, the onus definitely would lay on us to safeguard our environment.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-01-27 lakhveer khokhar 73 view
2020-08-26 vgoel.rrpl 73 view
2020-08-26 vgoel.rrpl 78 view
2020-08-26 vgoel.rrpl 78 view
2020-08-26 vgoel.rrpl 78 view
Essays by user vgoel.rrpl :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 811, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...hich are available to him at the store. Hence the store does drive the consumer behav...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 499, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ckled else the product would phase out. Finally, both the above thoughts need to...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, hence, if, nonetheless, so, for example, in spite of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1873.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13150684932 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82490010742 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575342465753 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0233549071 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.055555556 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2777777778 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209149921831 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613641309748 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533714825972 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113056126923 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498727122267 0.056905535591 88% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 811, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...hich are available to him at the store. Hence the store does drive the consumer behav...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 499, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ckled else the product would phase out. Finally, both the above thoughts need to...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, hence, if, nonetheless, so, for example, in spite of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1873.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13150684932 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82490010742 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575342465753 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0233549071 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.055555556 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2777777778 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209149921831 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613641309748 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533714825972 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113056126923 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498727122267 0.056905535591 88% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.