Some people think that dangerous sports should be banned while others think people should be free to choose Discuss both views and give your opinion

Sports is always the best entertainment. It also carries the country sentiment at the international level. Almost everyone loves sports as preferred pass time event, whereas, many people go crazy with the thrill related to the dangerous ones. A part of people believes that sportsmen should be free to decide that, however, some have an opposite opinion on the same. This essay will discuss both the view and will support why the freedom to choose is important.

Sports can of different levels depending on the risk involved with it. The audience mainly watches it for entertainment, but a sportsperson has to go through a lot of tough training to be at a competitive level. Few of the games can even be challenging and a small mishap can cost the players life. For instance, high mountain climbing looks fascinating for viewers but a minor slip in that stiff mountains can take the person's breath off. So, even though these dangerous and difficult sports are a one been preferred by people they should be some sort of restriction.

Practice can make a person perfect, or close to perfect. Everything that looks difficult or easy at a glance, is not always the same. The same goes for sports here. The car or bike racing, for instance, looks amazing while watching but that shows is an output of extensive practice and experience. While there are in the sports the risk is always covered by a lot of safety measures. While particular games could have a lot of risks involved but the experience and safety should be adequate enough to accommodate them all. Thus a person should be free to pick any sports if they have the basic criteria fulfilled.

In conclusion, many sports require knowledge of the games. One can pursue a course to understand the games and gain experience. In my opinion, people should be given the chance to select the sports of their choice once they have gone through the certification.

Votes
Average: 7.4 (3 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 286, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'players'' or 'player's'?
Suggestion: players'; player's
...lenging and a small mishap can cost the players life. For instance, high mountain climb...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 421, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ip in that stiff mountains can take the persons breath off. So, even though these dange...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 299, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t of extensive practice and experience. While there are in the sports the risk is alw...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 524, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...dequate enough to accommodate them all. Thus a person should be free to pick any spo...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so, thus, whereas, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, sort of, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1589.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82978723404 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66460834942 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553191489362 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.3992937783 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.45 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.45 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304395666329 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810716581744 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0842998519334 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190957485947 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519381058687 0.056905535591 91% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 286, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'players'' or 'player's'?
Suggestion: players'; player's
...lenging and a small mishap can cost the players life. For instance, high mountain climb...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 421, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ip in that stiff mountains can take the persons breath off. So, even though these dange...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 299, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t of extensive practice and experience. While there are in the sports the risk is alw...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 524, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...dequate enough to accommodate them all. Thus a person should be free to pick any spo...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so, thus, whereas, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, sort of, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1589.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82978723404 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66460834942 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553191489362 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.3992937783 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.45 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.45 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304395666329 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810716581744 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0842998519334 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190957485947 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519381058687 0.056905535591 91% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.