Indeed, mobiles and computers are popular among teenagers. Almost every adolescent owns a mobile and a computer. Regarding the disadvantage of owning electronic devices, some people believe cell phonea and computers are adverse to writing and reading skills of youngsters. Personally, I am totally agree with this view. Informal writing and scattered reading are the two culpts that undermining wrinting and reading skills when using mobiles and computers.
To begin with, communication via mobiles and computers is predominantly informal writhing; whereas, one criterion of writing skills is formal. Normally, teenagers communicate online via short messages and twitter, which are informal. As youngsters are adapting to informal writing style, formal writing skills will soon be forgotten. Even worse, youngsters write e-mail in an informal way, which is detrimental for work because people are expecting a formal e-mail. In certain case, people merely ignore an informal written e-mail after a glance of the style. This is one disadvantage deriving from using mobiles and computers.
Moreover, scattered reading, the other habit developed from surfing online, is undermining reading skills of teenagers. Contemprary adolescents skip and skan materials on screen as a result of volunineous information surges in Internet every minute.Readers merely go through titles but not details when tackle with a screen of completely new information. This reading method acquires little detailed information, which is not an efficient reading skill. To make things worse, teenagers cannnot focus when they are readng a actual book.
To summarize, mobiles and computers flourish informal writing style and scattered reading, which are in contrary with formal writing skill and effective reading skill. Therefore, computers and mobiles are underming the reading and writing skills of adolescents. Teenagers ought to spend less time on mobiles and computers to avoid these problems.
- Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary to schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning on practical skills. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- TPO-24 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?One of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part-time job.Use specific reasons and examples 88
- the bar chart shows scores of 3 teams a, b nd c over four different seasons. summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons were relevant. 61
- The illustrations below show how coffee is sometimes produce. 32
- Topic: some people think that the best way to gather information is through newspapers while others believe in other better ways. Discuss both of views. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 299, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...of youngsters. Personally, I am totally agree with this view. Informal writing and sc...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 371, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an informal way" with adverb for "informal"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...en. Even worse, youngsters write e-mail in an informal way, which is detrimental for work because ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 250, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Readers
...rmation surges in Internet every minute.Readers merely go through titles but not detail...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 522, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...gers cannnot focus when they are readng a actual book. To summarize, mobiles a...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, whereas, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1690.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78767123288 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85267188987 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561643835616 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The sentence length is short
Sentence length SD: 45.8596893918 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8888888889 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2222222222 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 7.06120827912 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229976501389 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834096938669 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476793674486 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161195652663 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650792702532 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.