Some people think that good teamwork makes a company successful others think that good leadership is the reason behind the success of a company Discuss both sides and give your opinion

While some people argue that we should emphasize the importance of great management to achieve success, others take the view that focusing on cooperation is more important. In my opinion, it is better to select a great management for enduring success.

On one side of the argument, there are people who hold the opinion that encouraging cooperation will yield better results. The most compelling reason for believing this is that such traits are essential for smooth running of an organization. For instance, an organization can only achieve its overall results if all parts work together and complement each other. Studies have shown that an organization is highly productive when the working environment is healthy. In order to achieve this, all employees need have important traits like compassion and generosity.

Despite the above arguments, I am of the view that encouraging to recruit and maintain great management staff will prove to be more beneficial. Indeed, one reason why I take this position is that in many instances, organizations have reached soaring heights only because of the foresight of such leaders. These leaders are predominantly responsible for an organization's success. This is because they have innate abilities and innumerable experience to take the company's growth forward. Moreover, they can hire several supervisors for various departments to tackle any potential obstacles respectively. Although this is a partial solution to the problem mentioned above, still it has proved beneficial in many circumstances.

In conclusion, while both views are commonly held in society, I believe hiring efficient leaders is crucial for enduring success of an organization. This is because of their vast experience and abilities that they are able to achieve their desired outcomes. Additionally, they are in a position to remove any potential issues arising due to lack of cooperation. Given this situation, it is recommended that organizations should put in more effort to search an appropriate leader with requisite qualities. This encourages growth and the pursuit of excellence.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 64, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'recruiting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: recruiting
...ents, I am of the view that encouraging to recruit and maintain great management staff wil...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 357, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'organizations'' or 'organization's'?
Suggestion: organizations'; organization's
...rs are predominantly responsible for an organizations success. This is because they have inna...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, still, while, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1786.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49538461538 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08878329582 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572307692308 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 569.7 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.556234328 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.2222222222 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0555555556 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0977781271801 0.244688304435 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0317730990836 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0396680450366 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0696980805512 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043857616376 0.056905535591 77% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.32 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.