Some people think that the government should spend money on faster public transportation, others think that there is other important priorities of public transport eg, cost reduction and environment. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Some have argued that the state should invest money for fastening public transport, whereas others disagree and believe rather than spending sums for the speed of public vehicles lawmakers should put money to reduce the cost of traveling in public transportations and environment. This essay examines both views and stands in favor of a later viewpoint because of the recent environmental damages occurred by the overuse of vehicles and people's disinterest to travel by public vehicles.
To begin with, fastening the public transport could be extremely beneficial for the whole commuter. Because of the waste of time while traveling through them. Usually, public vehicles have own schedule to come and go and they are often late because of the vehicle stop in many places while letting the passengers enter an exit. Consequently, these processes consume so long time making delay to others and they are compelled to lose time while waiting inside of the public transportation. To illustrate, in Nepal, many passengers are often obliged to wait for so long inside the bus because of the time that vehicle requires to add and to go out on the bus. That is the reason why the government should consider to spend any amount to improve the speed of public transportation.
On the contrary, although to increase the speed is also a needed thing, however, the most problematic issues that should be resolved instantly is cost reduction and save environmental issues. Individuals are even out of the access to public transport because of the bus fare, as students, professionals are needed to travel daily which creates difficulty to pay for the bus rent. Secondly, our environment has been polluting day by day by the flow of vehicles on the road. People have more breathing problem caused by the contaminated fumes comes through vehicles by it. According to the health statistics report done by the prominent research center blamed the dangerous air as the greatest cause of lung cancer like illnesses. That is the way due to these reasons also I reckon to invest in the environmental improvements and bus fair is more important.
In conclusion, the debate over government fund that where to spend money either for the improvement on the environment and decline bus fare or to make public transportation more faster is yet to be solved. I agree the sums would be well spent if the state prioritizes more to deduct fare prices and save the environment because of the then increased contaminated fumes that are making more people ill and compulsion of person to bear the everyday bus fare.
- Your friend wrote a letter to you asking for advice on their parents both elderly visiting your area.In the letter, you must give a suggestion of which area is the best, recommend a place to stay, Invite them to do something with you. 89
- n some countries unemployment is high therefore some people think children should study the only primary education and not secondary education as because they can not find jobs in the future To what extent do you agree or disagree 88
- Some people believed that entertainers are more important than scientists Do you agree or disagree 81
- Write a letter to Tour Company manager to appreciate your tour guide Give your Tour details.What do you like about the tour guide Suggest ways for the manager to appreciate the guide 89
- Some people think that the government should spend money on faster public transportation, others think that there is other important priorities of public transport eg, cost reduction and environment. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 101, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...mely beneficial for the whole commuter. Because of the waste of time while traveling th...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 626, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'adding'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: adding
...cause of the time that vehicle requires to add and to go out on the bus. That is the r...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 704, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'consider spending'.
Suggestion: consider spending
...is the reason why the government should consider to spend any amount to improve the speed of publ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 209, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'evened'.
Suggestion: evened
...e environmental issues. Individuals are even out of the access to public transport b...
^^^^
Line 7, column 426, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'day by'.
Suggestion: day by
...dly, our environment has been polluting day by day by the flow of vehicles on the road. Peopl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 174, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'faster' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: faster
...s fare or to make public transportation more faster is yet to be solved. I agree the sums w...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, whereas, while, i reckon, in conclusion, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2161.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 430.0 315.596192385 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02558139535 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82225280064 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513953488372 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 686.7 506.74238477 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.014242594 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.0625 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.875 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240596086351 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0755235904953 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0822341387147 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155681091414 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0950766806434 0.056905535591 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.